On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 07:15:15PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
>
> As far as I can see it, we are left to write down each target
> explicitly.
Which is not an issue in my opinion in our case.
Like I said on IRC:
Generally speaking I'd prefer if the Makefile is 20 lines longer and
very
On Mon, 29 May 2017 18:46:53 +0200
Quentin Rameau wrote:
>
The essence of the problem is this sentence in the spec[0]:
"A target that has prerequisites, but does not have any
commands, __can__ be used to add to the prerequisite list for
that target.
On Mon, 29 May 2017 18:46:53 +0200
Quentin Rameau wrote:
Hey Quentin,
> Well, I've been warning you with the first patch long ago.
yes, and admittedly, even though it was a painful process, I learned a
lot about make and how sadly infested the ecosystem is with GNU
> Makefile-workaround for OpenBSD
At last!
> Thanks Hiltjo for reporting this!
Well, I've been warning you with the first patch long ago.
> For some reason, OpenBSD make does not add $(BIN).o to the
> dependency list when it sees the $(BIN) target rule. It does so
> however