Its seems that Micro$oft has made special efforts to have their web page viewed properly in Mozilla ;-)
Shlomo Yona wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Orr Dunkelman wrote:
As you might read (heard/witnessed) MS has a new campign - Get the facts.
Now, the beak (Ha'makor) has a response ready -- Checkin
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Orr Dunkelman wrote:
>
> As you might read (heard/witnessed) MS has a new campign - Get the facts.
>
> Now, the beak (Ha'makor) has a response ready -- Checking the facts:
> http://www.hamakor.org.il/CheckTheFacts
>
> Feel free to enjoy and tell others.
Nice.
The copyrigh
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Orna Agmon wrote:
> A laptop with GIMP can ceratinly be made available. Debian unstable.
>
> Regarding the contents: maybe , instead of first introducing the
> background and later the implementation, we could do the reverse here.
> Since the basic lecture is about the impleme
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell wrote:
>
> I have been told that my previous mail to the list in relation to
> Haifux being Linux or GNU/Linux, was an inappropriate and inflammatory
> email.
>
I did not felt it was inappropriate or flammatory. It was a bit of a
flame-bait, but I think
As you might read (heard/witnessed) MS has a new campign - Get the facts.
Now, the beak (Ha'makor) has a response ready -- Checking the facts:
http://www.hamakor.org.il/CheckTheFacts
Feel free to enjoy and tell others.
--
Orr Dunkelman,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Any human thing supposed to be comple
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Alon Altman wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell wrote:
> >
> > My question is this:
> >
> > This lecture would be much cooler if I had a running GIMP to play with
> > loaded with my photographs. It would be much nicer than looking at
> > "before" and "after" sl
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell wrote:
>
> My question is this:
>
> This lecture would be much cooler if I had a running GIMP to play with
> loaded with my photographs. It would be much nicer than looking at
> "before" and "after" slides. Can you people pull that off? I'm not a
> technio