On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:47 PM, guy keren c...@actcom.co.il wrote:
Since i've moved back to using gdb alot, and since i got tired of the
limitations from the past, i started digging deeper into the
documentation, and found a wealth of features that were added to gdb
over the years (some
Hello Haifa Linuxers!
I wonder - why was it so long since we had Welcome 2 Linux lectures in
Haifa?
I had a couple of friends at home a week a go that have just installed Linux
on their Laptops. One of them told me he haven't turned on his Window$
machine for more than a week and he is really
2009/1/13 Amichai Rotman amic...@iglu.org.il
Hello Haifa Linuxers!
I wonder - why was it so long since we had Welcome 2 Linux lectures in Haifa?
I had a couple of friends at home a week a go that have just installed Linux
on their Laptops. One of them told me he haven't turned on his
2009/1/13 Eli Billauer e...@billauer.co.il:
And in case someone picks up on this offer, I suggest comparing with MATLAB.
Or Octave, if you're into free software. My impression was that it's
basically the same principle, and we're facing Yet Another Language (TM).
R is not meant to0 compete
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 14:15:33 Eli Billauer wrote:
Orr, please book him! I don't care if it will be him and me only.
By the way, isn't gdb still the backend for *all* debugging tools under
Linux?
Not really. First of all, high-level languages like Perl, Python, Ruby, etc.
have their
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 15:35:49 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 03:22:44PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I should note that about a month ago, I considered to finally contribute
to gdb by fixing bugs, but then saw that they are still using CVS. I
asked on IRC why that was still
