[Haifux] Offer to help someone with Openoffice and free software for pay

2010-04-08 Thread Yoni Rabkin
Hello, An acquaintance has contacted me with the request that I help them with problems involving Openoffice and other pieces of free software in return for a fee. I personally am not interested. But if someone is interested in giving free software tech support for a fee, in Haifa, please contac

Re: [Haifux] Haifos?

2010-04-08 Thread Dotan Cohen
> Gah, this thread should have been a week ago. Like > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/969355 . > Was that a serious question? No, that date, it looks familiar... I am going to post that very question to ubuntu-users. Oh, the troll I've become... -- Dotan Cohen http://bido.com http

Re: [Haifux] Haifos?

2010-04-08 Thread Dave Roi
Haifreedom? :-) On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 16:32, Orr Dunkelman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Tzafrir Cohen > wrote: > > No. "FOSS", as we all know, fails to state that we're talking about > > Free (*Libre*) OSS, and may confuse people to thing we're talking about > > freebies. Thus the

Re: [Haifux] Haifos?

2010-04-08 Thread Orr Dunkelman
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > No. "FOSS", as we all know, fails to state that we're talking about > Free (*Libre*) OSS, and may confuse people to thing we're talking about > freebies. Thus the name should be HaiFLOSS. And the homepage should be > green. This idea was sugg

Re: [Haifux] Haifos?

2010-04-08 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 04:25:17PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > On Wednesday 07 Apr 2010 15:54:22 Dotan Cohen wrote: > > Considering that many lectures and mailing list topics are not > > Linux-specific, might it be wise to take Shlomi Fish's example and > > rename to Haifos - Haifa Open Source? I p

Re: [Haifux] Haifos?

2010-04-08 Thread boazg
haifux has a ring to it that kinda makes it obvious what it's about. it's also become known over the years in the technion CS faculty. i think it's a better idea to keep it On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 22:05, Michael Vasiliev wrote: > On 07/04/2010 19:20, Shachar Raindel wrote: > > But why are you th