Regarding the first 3 CDs they are truely Redhat CDs.
The last CD contains redhat updates and a few more things
which are by no means redhat.
I do think we should add an inner cover(at least for the updates CD)
making it abundantly clear, that this CD was not compiled by RedHat but
does contain
Read the Red Hat FAQs.
-Original Message-
From: Maor Meir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 12:16 PM
To: RAVIA
Cc: Shachar Shemesh; Haifux
Subject: Re: [Haifux] CD logos
Regarding the first 3 CDs they are truely Redhat CDs.
The last CD contains
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Haim Ravia wrote:
Read the Red Hat FAQs.
/me is reading the FAQ.
There is nothing unclear about this: The updates CD is not the problem: it
is the three RH cds. We, in this case hamakor, which is the legal body, is
selling CDs, and getting money. It does not matter that
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Orna Agmon wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Haim Ravia wrote:
Read the Red Hat FAQs.
/me is reading the FAQ.
There is nothing unclear about this: The updates CD is not the problem: it
is the three RH cds. We, in this case hamakor, which is the legal body, is
Couldn't agree more (although I ache the loss of a potentially good case :)
-Original Message-
From: Orna Agmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 12:54 PM
To: RAVIA
Cc: 'Maor Meir'; 'Shachar Shemesh'; 'Haifux'
Subject: RE: [Haifux] CD logos
On Mon
We should prepare a small page saying (a) we give no warranties and (b) This
distribution does not include support (either technical or developer)
services from Red Hat but that such services may be purchased from Red Hat
separately. This page will be given to anyone who buys a CD set.
Note
This clean the first 3 CDs (we only need to fix the instalee forms
now...). We still need to fix the updates CD.
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Alon Altman wrote:
From http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/guidelines/page9.html :
Educational Institutions, Not-For-Profits, Linux User Groups
Well,,, I should have read these pages also :( Thanks, Alon. I imagine
Haifux should qualify as a Linux User Group so the changed neede are
adding a printed document with the content described below.
-Original Message-
From: Haifux - Haifa Linux Club
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On Monday 10 November 2003 13:41, Shachar Raindel wrote:
This clean the first 3 CDs (we only need to fix the instalee forms
now...). We still need to fix the updates CD.
The updates CD does not try to be RH Linux, and it is not a modified version
of RH. It is no more then updates, made by Rh
Haim Ravia wrote:
While I have my own reservations regarding the Red Hat policy, let me offer
you the following simple guideline: what is right = what is legal.
Not trying to open an old discussion again, but I would like it
explained again, if you can.
As far as I understand Trademark law -
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Furthermore - RedHat themselves distribute RedHat Linux 9 as
free downloads from their site, without any accompanying
support. As such, it is them (the trademark holder) that
decided that the specific ISOs can be called RedHat Linux 9.
Unless
Nice. I'm impressed. Way to go.
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Alon Altman wrote:
Hi,
The CD designs for the Linux day are available at
http://www.haifux.org/newcomers/cd-logo/
Alon
--
Adir Abraham
Technion's Advisors
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Alon Altman wrote:
Hi,
The CD designs for the Linux day are available at
http://www.haifux.org/newcomers/cd-logo/
Alon
Very pretty. I like the updates design more, though. But- what about RH
wishing people to avoid the usage of the trademark RedHat when
Aren't we limited to 3 or 2 colors? I counted few more on that design, and
simple dithering filter will make it look really bad.
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Alon Altman wrote:
Hi,
The CD designs for the Linux day are available at
http://www.haifux.org/newcomers/cd-logo/
Alon
--
This message was
14 matches
Mail list logo
