are required to be independent, assertive, ready to learn (and a
lot), knack for automated tasks and a corporate point of view.
I am outing myself a bit, but you are most invited to search for my name,
Etzion Bar-Noy or my nick name, ezaton, on the net. You are most invited to
read my technical blog
I would be glad to hear such a lecture. +1 for me too!
Ez
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:59 AM, c...@actcom.co.il wrote:
In this story, we'll follow the life story of alice - a
file-systemized I/O request, and bob - a raw-device I/O
request, from their birth, until they reach heaven (the disk
Not because you can't.
Because for the enterprise market, where Centos is aimed at, *supportability
* is more important than 1.2% additional performance, or a certain new
experimental feature.
For your own home/development box, do whatever you want. For Enterprise?
Hell, no.
Ez
On Sun, Jan 23,
Xming is a good choice.
You could use FreeNX as well, as it is very network-efficient, and
persistent, which X is not.
Ez
2010/8/4 Shahar Dag d...@cs.technion.ac.il
Hello
I am looking for a free X-terminal software that will run on an Win-XP
station and will allow me an easy access to
It was fixed for 3.1 (I think), and now works just fine, out of the box.
Ez
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Sorana Fraier sf10...@gmail.com wrote:
No. It does. Did quite happily now. USB 1.1, as far as I can recall, but
for me it was quite enough.
Nice surprise. Last time I checked the
Sequential IO is very simple, relatively, so that you will hardly feel the
performance impact testing it.
Test random IO loads with small packets (0.5K-4K) and you will probably feel
the performance impact there.
Ez
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Eli Billauer e...@billauer.co.il wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Sorana Fraier sf10...@gmail.com wrote:
the only drawback of virtualbox open source is that it doesn't allow to
attach a usb. The binary version allows that.
No. It does. Did quite happily now. USB 1.1, as far as I can recall, but for
me it was quite enough.
