Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I'll have to think about that one. My Wine lectures already carry a
license which is rather simplistic, but should answer whatever is
needed. As for the security lectures - I'll have to look into those.
If anyone needs to do anything specific with them, they are welcome
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Ron Artstein wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Maor Meir wrote:
an ideal license as far as I am concerned would allow others to
use my work convinient while making sure I get appropreate
credit for my work but not allow anyone to attach my name to
any junk some how
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Eli Billauer wrote:
OK, let's realize one simple thing.
If someone wants to take something from these lectures, they will. If
they want to give credits, they will. If they don't want to, they wont.
And if they don't have a license, they will be breaking the law.
Alon Altman wrote:
And that's exactly why we want the licenses to say that explictly, so that
the one lecture written on company time and based on sources which do not
want to be widely redistributed will not lead to people suing Haifux. The
licensing should have been done in the first place
Alon Altman wrote:
You may not, however, claim you
wrote these texts, due to the simple fact that you didn't.
Even that is not 100% correct.
I guess false advertising and libel laws may apply, but consider the
following case:
I take the classic BSD TCP/IP stack (public domain).
I put in lots
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong here. I'm going out on a limb and saying what is
on my mind. No need to get offended, I'm just another non-lawyer playing
the this is legal and that is not game with you all.
Let us say that I have a work that is
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Orna Agmon wrote:
Thanks to Alon altman, I went to http://creativecommons.org/license/ and
created licenses according to people's requests. The lectures by the
people who already replied carry links to the appropriate licenses. As you
can see there, they give the
Orr Dunkelman wrote:
Well, such a license would not be free. I do not recall, however, that
releasing the lecture slides under a free license was a prerequisit to
giving a Haifux lecture.
Shachar
Well, it is not, you can keep whatever rights you want. We don't force no
one to
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 02:49:14PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Well, such a license would not be free. I do not recall, however, that
releasing the lecture slides under a free license was a prerequisit to
giving a Haifux lecture.
One practical test applies here:
Can I use code snippents
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Maor Meir wrote:
Can anyone give here or point me to a short review of
free licenses when talking about lecture slides on such like.
I am fammilier with what it means to GPL/LGPL/ public domain license
software, I am uncertain of how these licenses apply to anything
Hello lecturers and would be lecturers,
Currently most of the lectures slides are displayed on-line, some even
with their sources, but without any license.
We have been approached for a permission to translate a lot of the
material to Bulgarian.
In order to be able to reply to this request (and
11 matches
Mail list logo
