On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote:
Hi all!
When talking with someone a few days ago, I had a moment of Serendipity (see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serendipity ). Why don't we do a Welcome-to-
FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) this year instead of
I don't think people will need our help to enter themselves to free
software on Windows, while they do need our help to get around in
Linux.
I agree with this *most* of the way. I think it's better to keep
the focus of the Introduction series on Linux, but to add in one
lecture that
IMHO it's a branding issue. Linux is a brand name. When you say Welcome to
Linux it has associations. When you say welcome to FOSS, people give you a
blank stare, and then you have to explain, all the while making sure your
arguments don't enter tin-foil-hat land.
It's not as if Welcome to Linux
I agree. Welcome to Linux and FOSS should be the name, and a short (no
more than 20 words) explanation of the name should preclude the event.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:06 PM, boazg boaz.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO it's a branding issue. Linux is a brand name. When you say Welcome to
Linux it
On Friday 11 September 2009 13:26:32 Ohad Lutzky wrote:
I agree. Welcome to Linux and FOSS should be the name, and a short (no
more than 20 words) explanation of the name should preclude the event.
Welcome to FOSS may have been a name I used out of convenience. We can call
it Welcome to Open
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:26:32PM +0300, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
I agree. Welcome to Linux and FOSS should be the name, and a short (no
more than 20 words) explanation of the name should preclude the event.
Now try pronouncing that :-)
It's not that short.
--
Tzafrir Cohen |
