On 01/05/2010 02:27 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
Existing tests only excercised operations with relatively small objects.
It did not test pipelining of object data in sufficient degree. So, let's
have a better test case for this (large-object.c).
We also change the existing basic-object.c to match.
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:14:08 -0500
Jeff Garzik j...@garzik.org wrote:
a follow-up patch that checks the checksums of the data sent/received
would be nice...
That would require more coding than using single check bytes because
a checksum can span a block boundary. But ok, you're right, I'll do
Existing tests only excercised operations with relatively small objects.
It did not test pipelining of object data in sufficient degree. So, let's
have a better test case for this (large-object.c).
We also change the existing basic-object.c to match.
Signed-Off-By: Pete Zaitcev
