Re: [PATCH tabled 1/2] server/config.c: don't dereference NULL on OOM

2010-09-24 Thread Jim Meyering
Jeff Garzik wrote: On 09/23/2010 04:43 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: From fb7865d158b0d32907dde703c4d37c70a26e738c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyeringmeyer...@redhat.com Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:11:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH tabled 1/2] server/config.c: don't dereference NULL on OOM (see

Re: [PATCH tabled 1/2] server/config.c: don't dereference NULL on OOM

2010-09-24 Thread Jim Meyering
Jeff Garzik wrote: On 09/23/2010 03:19 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: 3) I process patches similar to how Linus and others in the kernel do it: git am /path/to/mbox_of_patches That tends to impose some restrictions on the contents of each email. FWIW, 'git pull' submissions are welcome. Standard

Re: [PATCH tabled 1/2] server/config.c: don't dereference NULL on OOM

2010-09-24 Thread Jeff Garzik
On 09/24/2010 07:32 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: You can pull from the oom branch here: git://git.infradead.org/users/meyering/tabled.git Got nearly everything perfect. Need one more minor yet important change. As described in doc/contributions.txt, every changeset MUST have a Signed-off-by

Re: [PATCH tabled 1/2] server/config.c: don't dereference NULL on OOM

2010-09-24 Thread Jim Meyering
Jeff Garzik wrote: On 09/24/2010 07:32 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: You can pull from the oom branch here: git://git.infradead.org/users/meyering/tabled.git Got nearly everything perfect. Need one more minor yet important change. As described in doc/contributions.txt, every changeset MUST

Re: [PATCH tabled 1/2] server/config.c: don't dereference NULL on OOM

2010-09-24 Thread Jeff Garzik
On 09/24/2010 01:43 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: On 09/24/2010 07:32 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: You can pull from the oom branch here: git://git.infradead.org/users/meyering/tabled.git Got nearly everything perfect. Need one more minor yet important change. As described in