Simon Reap wrote:
>> On 25/08/2010 16:15, Clive Woodfine wrote:
>> My eeePC 701 (UNR installed) has started running something that is
>> using 100% cpu as shown by System Monitor/Resources. All attempts
>> using all likely variations of the ps command and top have failed to
>> identify any process
Hi All.
I've installed Fedora 13 on an old Dell Latitude laptop. I'm having some
trouble with it.
Frequently, when I click the left mouse(pad) button, the button I'm
pressing doesn't work - it changes colour to indicate the press, but
doesn't do anything until I move the mouse pointer. Looking a
On 25/08/2010 18:13, Clive Woodfine wrote:
On 25 August 2010 17:29, Russell Morris wrote:
Is this Ubuntu?
I've seen System Monitor itself cause the CPU to show at 100%.
On 25 August 2010 17:25, Simon Reap wrote:
Yes it is a version of Ubuntu specifically for the eee 701. It has
worked wel
On 25 August 2010 17:29, Russell Morris wrote:
> Is this Ubuntu?
>
> I've seen System Monitor itself cause the CPU to show at 100%.
>
>
> On 25 August 2010 17:25, Simon Reap wrote:
Yes it is a version of Ubuntu specifically for the eee 701. It has
worked well until about 2 weeks ago, possibly oc
Is this Ubuntu?
I've seen System Monitor itself cause the CPU to show at 100%.
On 25 August 2010 17:25, Simon Reap wrote:
> On 25/08/2010 16:15, Clive Woodfine wrote:
>
>> My eeePC 701 (UNR installed) has started running something that is
>> using 100% cpu as shown by System Monitor/Resources
On 25/08/2010 16:15, Clive Woodfine wrote:
My eeePC 701 (UNR installed) has started running something that is
using 100% cpu as shown by System Monitor/Resources. All attempts
using all likely variations of the ps command and top have failed to
identify any process using anywhere near this value
My eeePC 701 (UNR installed) has started running something that is
using 100% cpu as shown by System Monitor/Resources. All attempts
using all likely variations of the ps command and top have failed to
identify any process using anywhere near this value.
As usual all suggestions gratefully receive
On 25/08/10 09:19, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:14:10AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Sean,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:55:09AM +, Sean Gibbins wrote:
I can't answer the the question as to why this is present, but I suspect
that there will be something that explains
On 25/08/10 10:55, Sean Gibbins wrote:
> On 24/08/10 22:05, Leo wrote:
>> I've just got a new laptop and in the bios there is an option to
>> select what OS is installed with three options:
>> Other
>> WinXP
>> Vista / Win7
>>
>> Does anyone know what difference this makes, and is Other the best to
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:14:10AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:55:09AM +, Sean Gibbins wrote:
> > I can't answer the the question as to why this is present, but I suspect
> > that there will be something that explains the reason for this on the
> > la
Hi Sean,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:55:09AM +, Sean Gibbins wrote:
> I can't answer the the question as to why this is present, but I suspect
> that there will be something that explains the reason for this on the
> laptop manufacturer's Web site or in the manual.
If it's anything like th
On 24/08/10 22:05, Leo wrote:
I've just got a new laptop and in the bios there is an option to
select what OS is installed with three options:
Other
WinXP
Vista / Win7
Does anyone know what difference this makes, and is Other the best to
choose for Linux?
Hi Leo,
I can't answer the the ques
On 24/08/10 23:05, Leo wrote:
> I've just got a new laptop and in the bios there is an option to select
> what OS is installed with three options:
> Other
> WinXP
> Vista / Win7
>
> Does anyone know what difference this makes, and is Other the best to
> choose for Linux?
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
> -
13 matches
Mail list logo
