[Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Tony Whitmore
Hi all, Are there any options for remote wiping Linux systems, in the case of them being lost or stolen? I'm sure that some funky trigger mechanism could be set up using dyndns and SSH, but I was looking for something that would scale to a larger number of devices. Thanks, Tony -- Please

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Michael Pavling
On 14 November 2012 09:25, Tony Whitmore t...@tonywhitmore.co.uk wrote: Are there any options for remote wiping Linux systems, in the case of them being lost or stolen? I'm sure that some funky trigger mechanism could be set up using dyndns and SSH, but I was looking for something that would

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Victor Churchill
On 14 November 2012 09:30, Michael Pavling pavl...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 November 2012 09:25, Tony Whitmore t...@tonywhitmore.co.uk wrote: Are there any options for remote wiping Linux systems, in the case of them being lost or stolen? I'm sure that some funky trigger mechanism could be set

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Benjie Gillam
http://preyproject.com/ comes to mind. I agree with encryption being a better option, but the risk is if you don't shut down then your encryption key is still stored in RAM (most cold boot RAM extraction issues have been solved by shutdown scripts in the last few years, I think?) and if

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Tony Whitmore
On 2012-11-14 09:30, Michael Pavling wrote: On 14 November 2012 09:25, Tony Whitmore t...@tonywhitmore.co.uk wrote: Are there any options for remote wiping Linux systems, in the case of them being lost or stolen? I'm sure that some funky trigger mechanism could be set up using dyndns and

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Michael Pavling
On 14 November 2012 10:04, Tony Whitmore t...@tonywhitmore.co.uk wrote: I quite agree Michael, but at the moment encryption is not what they are looking to do. Ah... I see, corporates have made a decision about a solution, and are now looking for a problem it fits :-) What is their use-case

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Full Circle Podcast
Oh dear. This old chesnut again. Michael is absolutely right. They need an information security policy to cover use, storage and transport of data before they go leaping to BBC1 'Spooks' solutions. If I want to acquire data off a hooky laptop, first thing I do is remove the hard drive to a usb

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Tony Whitmore
On 2012-11-14 10:24, Michael Pavling wrote: The remote wipe stuff works well for machines that have their own network connections (3G phones and tablets), but for a desktop or laptop, it's not that likely to be of much use. If the machine auto-logs in, so that Ronnie or Reggie can at least use

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Bob Dunlop
On Wed, Nov 14 at 11:51, Full Circle Podcast wrote: Oh dear. This old chesnut again. Michael is absolutely right. They need an information security policy to cover use, storage and transport of data before they go leaping to BBC1 'Spooks' solutions. ... Encryption is not an option, probably

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Tony Whitmore
On 2012-11-14 12:14, Bob Dunlop wrote: On Wed, Nov 14 at 11:51, Full Circle Podcast wrote: Oh dear. This old chesnut again. Michael is absolutely right. They need an information security policy to cover use, storage and transport of data before they go leaping to BBC1 'Spooks' solutions. ...

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Victor Churchill
Since this seems to be getting a bit frivolous, I favour the startup option that says 'Enter password or this machine will self destruct in: and the big red flashing 04:59 ..04:58.. 04:57.. Sorry, Tony. I know you started this with serious intent., -- Please post to:

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Gordon Scott
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 14:06 +, Victor Churchill wrote: Since this seems to be getting a bit frivolous, I favour the startup option that says 'Enter password or this machine will self destruct in: and the big red flashing 04:59 ..04:58.. 04:57.. I seem to remember in Mission Impossible

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread James Courtier-Dutton
On 14 November 2012 09:51, Benjie Gillam ben...@jemjie.com wrote: I agree with encryption being a better option, but the risk is if you don't shut down then your encryption key is still stored in RAM (most cold boot RAM extraction issues have been solved by shutdown scripts in the last few

[Hampshire] Christmas Lecture

2012-11-14 Thread Tim Brocklehurst
Ladies and gentlemen, This is a reminder that the Christmas Lecture will be held on the 1st December at Southampton University. We will be next-door to our usual location (in Zepler/Mountbatten building). There will be signs in prominant positions. If you want to join us for the meal

Re: [Hampshire] Remote wipe of Linux systems

2012-11-14 Thread Paul Stimpson
James Courtier-Dutton james.dut...@gmail.com wrote: I think it would be nice to see a feature in Linux whereby the suspend to RAM erases the disk password held in RAM, and prompts the users for it on resume. That would help make a bit more of the data protected while in standby. If you are