Re: [Hampshire] Top posting

2014-05-27 Thread Joseph Bennie
or you know... you could just get on with life and not worry about the little things :) many more fields of issues in the world that need more time and attention brought to them! +1 -- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface:

Re: [Hampshire] Top posting

2014-05-27 Thread Michael Pavling
On 27 May 2014 12:37, Freaky Clown freakycl...@gmail.com wrote: or you know... you could just get on with life and not worry about the little things :) many more fields of issues in the world that need more time and attention brought to them yup... and if I wasn't spending so much effort

Re: [Hampshire] Top posting

2014-05-27 Thread Alan Pope
On 27 May 2014 13:37, Freaky Clown freakycl...@gmail.com wrote: or you know... you could just get on with life and not worry about the little things :) What, like this? https://twitter.com/__Freakyclown__/status/471250625335164928 :) -- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web

Re: [Hampshire] Top posting

2014-05-27 Thread Anton Piatek
On 27 May 2014 12:51, Michael Pavling pavl...@gmail.com wrote: On 27 May 2014 12:37, Freaky Clown freakycl...@gmail.com wrote: or you know... you could just get on with life and not worry about the little things :) many more fields of issues in the world that need more time and attention

Re: [Hampshire] Top posting

2014-05-27 Thread Michael Pavling
On 27 May 2014 12:54, Anton Piatek an...@piatek.co.uk wrote: Your presumption however assumes that it is that much harder to read? If it really were, then all mail clients would make top-posting hard. If I wrote my reply in ROT13, it would be harder to read. Ohg rznvy pyvragf qba'g cerirag zr

Re: [Hampshire] Top posting

2014-05-27 Thread Joseph Bennie
On a side note this is how all the emails read if you use delete a lot unnecessary words :) …. worry about the little things that need more time and attention brought to them if I was spending so much effort to read conversations to try to work out a reply in relation

Re: [Hampshire] Top posting

2014-05-27 Thread Vic
Your presumption however assumes that it is that much harder to read? A: Well, you wouldn't want to hear the punchline before the joke, would you? Q: Why is top posting bad? Personally I'd rather see secure email solved rather than top/bottom posting Secure email was solved many years

Re: [Hampshire] Top posting

2014-05-27 Thread Lisi
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 12:54:48 Anton Piatek wrote: Your presumption however assumes that it is that much harder to read? I find it so much harder to read that I usually just give up in despair. Lisi -- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface:

Re: [Hampshire] Top posting

2014-05-27 Thread Victor Churchill
On 27 May 2014 12:54, Anton Piatek an...@piatek.co.uk wrote: Your presumption however assumes that it is that much harder to read? If it really were, then all mail clients would make top-posting hard. The fact that most of the corporate mail clients don't speaks volumes for how the rest of

Re: [Hampshire] Top posting

2014-05-27 Thread Brad Rogers
On Tue, 27 May 2014 12:54:48 +0100 Anton Piatek an...@piatek.co.uk wrote: Hello Anton, because everything flows nicely, as it should. page looking for the start of the next paragraph? No, of course not, Finally, when reading a book, do you expect to have to jump about the From right to left,