Re: [Hampshire] Dud FS?

2012-01-31 Thread Ian Grody
Another way is to use a livecd to run fsck on the drive. fsck -y -c /dev/locationofdrivePartition -c will also run a simple read-test on sectors of the drive, in case there are 'bad-sectors' - This will take a wee while. -y will just answer yes to any and all questions (which may be

Re: [Hampshire] Dud FS?

2012-01-31 Thread Vic
Another way is to use a livecd to run fsck on the drive. Errr - I wouldn't. Once a drive has started dropping data like this, it is likely to keep on doing so. The more operations you perform, the more likely you are to drop stuff you want. This is why I suggest getting as much data off the

Re: [Hampshire] Dud FS?

2012-01-31 Thread Ian Grody
Depends how the error occurred. Clone the data than run a fsck -cc it will count how many fubars it detects. I have drives 8 years + old that are still going strong, with a couple with patched out areas from when a computer had the power removed abruptly. No more pending failures or errors

[Hampshire] Dud FS?

2012-01-30 Thread Rob Malpass
Hi all Funnily enough, I was reading about the prolonged hard drive price hike yesterday and hey presto, looks like I have my own drive failure today. Can anyone suggest if the following is terminal? I got the Ubuntu Target filesystem doesn't have /sbin/init and (not surprisingly) no GUI.

Re: [Hampshire] Dud FS?

2012-01-30 Thread Vic
1) Is that it for the drive Yes. 2) Is that it for the fs but the drive can be reused (i.e. a reinstall)? Probably not. The error you posted is a failure to read the journal. That means you might have lost any recent writes, but the data may be largely preserved - so far. What I do in