From all of that I was under the impression that sticking with
Gnome Classic was not really a long-term option, it would be either
Unity, Gnome 3 or a completely different desktop environment.
There is MATE which seems to work well but I don't like the idea of
sticking with a desktop that
But it is the case that upstream is not developing it anymore, isn't
it?
Yes. Spookily enough, that doesn't cause it to fail instantly.
And given what the Gnome project *is* developing, I don't really see it as
a problem that they're not developing Gnome2...
From all of that I was under the
On 02/10/2012 06:36, Vic wrote:
But it is the case that upstream is not developing it anymore, isn't
it?
Yes. Spookily enough, that doesn't cause it to fail instantly.
So not so much Gnome 2 then, as Gnome Twain :-)
G.
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface:
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:47:25PM +0100, Vic wrote:
GNOME 2 is dead.
...And looking remarkably sprightly on my Fedora 16 laptop...
But it is the case that upstream is not developing it anymore, isn't
it?
Also I have seen the fork of Gnome classic (I forget its name now)
derided
Haven't the old gnome devs created mate?
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Oct 2012, at 23:17, Andy Smith a...@strugglers.net wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:47:25PM +0100, Vic wrote:
GNOME 2 is dead.
...And looking remarkably sprightly on my Fedora 16 laptop...
But it is the case
Hi Ally,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:20:06PM +0100, Ally Biggs wrote:
Haven't the old gnome devs created mate?
Ah yes, that's the one that is the fork. I've seen a few people
disparage it as having too few developers, but they might be Gnome 3
fanboys I suppose..
Are people seeing that as a
I think it's going to be used in Linux Mint for future releases, As for Unity
and Gnome 3 both I dislike but both are
Better in comparison with Microsofts
New metro GUI god that thing is awful.
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Oct 2012, at 23:30, Andy Smith a...@strugglers.net wrote:
Hi Ally,
On
