Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-17 Thread Gordon Scott
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:29 +, Vic wrote: > > The slow server day was also the very day that I finally gave up on > > courtesy bounces. > > Bounces are not a courtesy; they are a significant part of the spam problem. Sadly that's true. Once upon a time, e-mail was either delivered or bounced

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-17 Thread Vic
> The slow server day was also the very day that I finally gave up on > courtesy bounces. Bounces are not a courtesy; they are a significant part of the spam problem. If you don't want an email *reject* it. Do not take it from the proffering MTA. Otherwise, if it is mis-addressed, you either swa

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-17 Thread Gordon Scott
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 10:59 +, Vic wrote: > > My server started to get very very slow, and when I investigated it was > > because it was trying to dump around 6000 spams a day > > I get rather more than that :-) Very likely; that was 8 years ago. > The trick is to reject (never bounce) the s

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-17 Thread Vic
> My server started to get very very slow, and when I investigated it was > because it was trying to dump around 6000 spams a day I get rather more than that :-) The trick is to reject (never bounce) the spam as early as possible. At the moment, the bulk seem to be forging the same address as th

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-17 Thread Gordon Scott
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 22:53 +, Vic wrote: > >> I have over 3500 email addresses > >> > > Vic the spam king then ;-) > > Nope. SpamAssassin does a fine job of keeping me largely spam-free. > > Rejecting forged addresses has a significant effect, too... Some years ago I used regularly to chang

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-16 Thread Vic
>> I have over 3500 email addresses >> > Vic the spam king then ;-) Nope. SpamAssassin does a fine job of keeping me largely spam-free. Rejecting forged addresses has a significant effect, too... Vic. -- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/ma

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-16 Thread Tim
On 16/11/11 22:39, Vic wrote: Having an e-mail account cull was what made me move my lug mail to gmail in the first place, in the last 12 months I have ceased 4 e-mail accounts. This now leaves me with 3 e-mail accounts. I went in quite the opposite direction; I have over 3500 email addresses (a

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-16 Thread Vic
> Having an e-mail account cull was what made me move my lug mail to gmail > in the first place, in the last 12 months I have ceased 4 e-mail > accounts. This now leaves me with 3 e-mail accounts. I went in quite the opposite direction; I have over 3500 email addresses (although only one account)

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-16 Thread Tim
On 16/11/11 12:08, john lewis wrote: On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:29:59 + Victor Churchill wrote: Using two accounts does add all sorts of fun and games to the equation..! Yup! I have three email addresses and claws-mail doesn't pick the right one when I reply to mailing-lists (it does it just

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-16 Thread john lewis
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:29:59 + Victor Churchill wrote: > Using two accounts does add all sorts of fun and games to the > equation..! Yup! I have three email addresses and claws-mail doesn't pick the right one when I reply to mailing-lists (it does it just fine when I reply to individuals) an

[Hampshire] test message

2011-11-16 Thread Lisi Reisz
On 16 November 2011 09:29, Victor Churchill wrote: > On 16 November 2011 09:22, Victor Churchill wrote: >> On 16 November 2011 08:01, Tim wrote: >>> On 16/11/11 07:57, Alan Pope wrote: On 16 November 2011 07:54, Tim wrote: > > Well it my post may have appeared on the list but I nev

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-16 Thread Victor Churchill
On 16 November 2011 09:22, Victor Churchill wrote: > On 16 November 2011 08:01, Tim wrote: >> On 16/11/11 07:57, Alan Pope wrote: >>> On 16 November 2011 07:54, Tim  wrote: Well it my post may have appeared on the list but I never received a copy >>> >>> You did, but gmail hides your ow

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-16 Thread Victor Churchill
On 16 November 2011 08:01, Tim wrote: > On 16/11/11 07:57, Alan Pope wrote: >> >> On 16 November 2011 07:54, Tim  wrote: >>> >>> Well it my post may have appeared on the list but I never received a copy >> >> You did, but gmail hides your own mail until someone else replies to >> it. Which makes s

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-16 Thread Philip Stubbs
On 16 November 2011 08:01, Tim wrote: > Thanks for the reply Alan and yes it is irritating the hell out of > me > > Time for another e-mail address change I think > > Tim Just a thought. Have you tried accessing your Gmail from an IMAP client? May be worth a try. -- Philip Stubbs -

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-16 Thread Tim
On 16/11/11 07:57, Alan Pope wrote: On 16 November 2011 07:54, Tim wrote: Well it my post may have appeared on the list but I never received a copy You did, but gmail hides your own mail until someone else replies to it. Which makes sense to me but irritates many people. Al. -- Please post t

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-15 Thread Alan Pope
On 16 November 2011 07:54, Tim wrote: > Well it my post may have appeared on the list but I never received a copy You did, but gmail hides your own mail until someone else replies to it. Which makes sense to me but irritates many people. Al. -- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web I

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-15 Thread Tim
On 16/11/11 01:29, Ian Grody wrote: Looks good Tim :-) On Tuesday 15 November 2011 20:49:43 Tim wrote: Testing to see if I can post yet. Sorry to bother anybody Tim -- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire LUG URL: h

Re: [Hampshire] test message

2011-11-15 Thread Ian Grody
Looks good Tim :-) On Tuesday 15 November 2011 20:49:43 Tim wrote: > Testing to see if I can post yet. > > Sorry to bother anybody > > Tim > > -- > Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk > Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire > LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.

[Hampshire] test message

2011-11-15 Thread Tim
Testing to see if I can post yet. Sorry to bother anybody Tim -- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk --