Re: [PATCH] MINOR: acl: add support for TLS ALPN matching

2018-12-29 Thread Alex Zorin
Unfortunately I attached the wrong patch file. Attaching in reply. Alex On Sun, Dec 30, 2018, at 2:20 PM, Alex Zorin wrote: > Hello, > > The attached patch adds acl support for the TLS ALPN extension > (RFC7301) extension via "req.ssl_alpn", in a similar vein to > "req.ssl_sni". > > It is

[PATCH] MINOR: acl: add support for TLS ALPN matching

2018-12-29 Thread Alex Zorin
Hello, The attached patch adds acl support for the TLS ALPN extension (RFC7301) extension via "req.ssl_alpn", in a similar vein to "req.ssl_sni". It is useful for pass-thru of TLS connections in scenarios like ACME's tls-alpn-01. Thank you Alex>From 8008e5e8f23747741ed005f56c247bcd366cfda9

Re: Question about Maglev algorithm

2018-12-29 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Am 29.12.2018 um 19:25 schrieb Valentin Vidic: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: >> I thought I have misunderstood the Idea behind maglev, thanks for >> clarification. > > Found another mention of Maglev [Eis16] for high-level load balancing (between >

Re: Question about Maglev algorithm

2018-12-29 Thread Valentin Vidic
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > I thought I have misunderstood the Idea behind maglev, thanks for > clarification. Found another mention of Maglev [Eis16] for high-level load balancing (between datacenters):

Re: Question about Maglev algorithm

2018-12-29 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Am 29.12.2018 um 07:41 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 07:55:11PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: >> Well as far as I understood the pdf one of the biggest difference is that >> Maglev is a distributed system where the consistent hash is for local system. > > No, not at all. The