I didn't see my original post(s) come back from haproxy@ mail-list, so I'm
trying again, hopefully consolidated a bit smaller :)
I have the configuration lines:
option httpchk
balance roundrobin
timeout connect 5s
timeout client 5s
timeout server 5s
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:40:50PM +0100, Ben wrote:
Is there a way to configure haproxy so it deals with available backends
ressources (number of active connexions) as sharable quotas, a bit like
Linux IP QoS can do for traffic shaping ?
ie. do a best effort to attribute a minimum number of
Hey Paul,
it's hard to reply to your mails, you send 10 questions at once. If it
takes an hour to reply to each mail, there's very little chance anyone
will find that time. Please try to split them by precise subjets and
expect that some of them will not get any reply :-)
I'll try to address
Is there a way to block URL terms without degrading performance (so kind of
like a WAF type function)?
Also, how to block IP? If there is doc a link is kewl too o, np.
Thanks!!!
Happy Holidays in advance =8^)
/*
Joe Stein, 973-944-0094
http://www.medialets.com
*/
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:31:49AM -0800, Paul Hirose wrote:
I didn't see my original post(s) come back from haproxy@ mail-list, so I'm
trying again, hopefully consolidated a bit smaller :)
yes it was posted.
I have the configuration lines:
option httpchk
balance roundrobin
i see that POST is a valid httpchk parameter, but without ripping
twisted apart, i'm not sure how it could allow an empty POST through
to code that could return a 200 or 204.
has anybody already gone through this?
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 01:25:24PM -0800, Paul Hirose wrote:
(...)
Next, I think this is related to what Willy warned about in a previous
thread about the default syslogd being slow. I fired off a giant
batch of requests at my haproxy, and there were a lot of error/warning
msgs on my window
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:07 PM, David Birdsong
david.birds...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:48:15PM -0800, David Birdsong wrote:
i see that POST is a valid httpchk parameter, but without ripping
twisted apart,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:40:17PM -0800, David Birdsong wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:07 PM, David Birdsong
david.birds...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:48:15PM -0800, David Birdsong wrote:
i see that POST
9 matches
Mail list logo