Re: option httpchk version 'trick'

2010-02-27 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Andrew, On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 03:15:25PM +1030, Andrew Commons wrote: Hi all, The ability to extend the option httpchk version argument string to dummy up a Host header is described as a 'trick' in the configuration documentation. I have found that the 'trick' can be extended to add

Re: sL flag

2010-02-27 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 03:07:40PM -0800, Joe Williams wrote: I wasn't able to find it in the documentation, what does the sL termination flag stand for? strange. It means there was a server timeout during the last transfer from the server to the client. But normally the last transfer is

RE: option httpchk version 'trick'

2010-02-27 Thread Andrew Commons
Hi Willy, Thanks for the comprehensive response. My HAProxy experience is measured in days and the mailing list seems a great way to get support and your contributions are always spot on. HAProxy looks like a fantastic, highly professional, piece of software. With respect to the HTTP check

Re: option httpchk version 'trick'

2010-02-27 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Andrew, On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 07:59:27PM +1030, Andrew Commons wrote: Hi Willy, Thanks for the comprehensive response. My HAProxy experience is measured in days and the mailing list seems a great way to get support and your contributions are always spot on. HAProxy looks like a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.4.0

2010-02-27 Thread Holger Just
Hi all, On 2010-02-26 16:02, Willy Tarreau wrote: I'm obviously interested in any problem report :-) I'm trying to compile Haproxy 1.4 on Opensolaris Build 133 (i386 on a Core i7). This however fails. make TARGET=solaris CPU=i686 USE_STATIC_PCRE=1 SMALL_OPTS=-I/usr/include/pcre [...] gcc

RE: option httpchk version 'trick'

2010-02-27 Thread Andrew Commons
Hi Willy, I was shooting from the lip with respect to the cookies. It's really about what scenarios you need to consider. If the client can choose the server they get directed to then you have to give that some thought and make sure your application behaves in a sensible manner. This would be

Re: sL flag

2010-02-27 Thread Joe Williams
Willy, This was on 1.3.23, it might have been a POST I will need to go back through the logs to find out. Thanks. -Joe On 2/27/10 12:26 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 03:07:40PM -0800, Joe Williams wrote: I wasn't able to find it in the documentation, what does the

Re: sL flag

2010-02-27 Thread Joe Williams
Looks like all the most recent sL's I have seen have been GET requests. Thanks. -Joe On 2/27/10 10:08 AM, Joe Williams wrote: Willy, This was on 1.3.23, it might have been a POST I will need to go back through the logs to find out. Thanks. -Joe On 2/27/10 12:26 AM, Willy Tarreau

Re: sL flag

2010-02-27 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:17:12AM -0800, Joe Williams wrote: Looks like all the most recent sL's I have seen have been GET requests. OK thanks Joe. I will look into the code to see how we can produce that. Maybe it's normal, but no obvious case comes to my mind. Regards, Willy

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.4.0

2010-02-27 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Holger, On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:28:12PM +0100, Holger Just wrote: Hi all, On 2010-02-26 16:02, Willy Tarreau wrote: I'm obviously interested in any problem report :-) I'm trying to compile Haproxy 1.4 on Opensolaris Build 133 (i386 on a Core i7). This however fails. thanks for