On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:05:16AM -0400, Greg Gard wrote:
thanks holger,
i did some research and was able to find more on mongrel and queuing.
so that helps to clarify. i am unsure what i will do viz checking in
the end as we have some long running requests that are frankly the
bane of my
yes it does willy. thanks. and i share your exasperation with our
situation. rails/mongrel is a pain AND we have tons of very slow/cpu
intensive legacy asp reporting code that is mission critical. we are
trying to undo the sins of our past (namely taking microsoft's word
for it...sorry any .net
Willy Tarreau wrote:
What would you consider a good indicator of its reliability? Would
running flawlessly for a week straight be enough of testing?
The fact that it runs a lot longer than previous run is a natural
indicator of reliability. However it's not an indicator of correctness.
I
Hi Dariusz,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:54:13AM +0100, Dariusz Suchojad wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
What would you consider a good indicator of its reliability? Would
running flawlessly for a week straight be enough of testing?
The fact that it runs a lot longer than previous run is a
4 matches
Mail list logo
