Re: strange issues with IE 6

2010-08-04 Thread eni-urgence
Hello. I have removed the friendly error message from IE and it display a blank page. I have not mentionned that i have stunnel in front of haproxy for ssl termination. I have made some test and capture packet and i think that it's stunnel that don't work. I will make more test. Cheers

Re: strange issues with IE 6

2010-08-04 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hello, On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 05:24:26PM +0200, eni-urgence wrote: Hello. I have removed the friendly error message from IE and it display a blank page. I have not mentionned that i have stunnel in front of haproxy for ssl termination. I have made some test and capture packet and i

Re: Haproxy filter by destination ip

2010-08-04 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:03:28PM +0100, Chris Sarginson wrote: Isn't this just done by configuring seperate listen section: listen IP1 172.200.17.3:80 default_backend backend1 listen IP2 172.17.200.17.4:80 default_backend backend2 Or is there something further about your solution

Re: HAProxy Setup not talking to Passenger/Apache

2010-08-04 Thread Nick Hilem
On Aug 4, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:40:35AM -0500, Nick Hilem wrote: The netstat only appears to show the latest HAProxy being run and the config file that I've been using is the one specified in the command. You were right that the errors above

Re: clarification of CD termination code

2010-08-04 Thread Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Bryan Talbot btal...@aeriagames.com wrote: In the tcpdump listed below, isn't the next-to-the-last RST also include an ACK of the data previously sent?  If that is the case, then the client has received all of the data and ACK'd it but then rudely closed the TCP

Re: HAProxy Setup not talking to Passenger/Apache

2010-08-04 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 04:24:56PM -0500, Nick Hilem wrote: Not sure how to determine if it was before or not... but I disabled the health checks and it appears to respond the same. you mean the same as with checks or the same as without haproxy ? Willy

Re: clarification of CD termination code

2010-08-04 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 04:29:08PM -0700, Bryan Talbot wrote: In the tcpdump listed below, isn't the next-to-the-last RST also include an ACK of the data previously sent? If that is the case, then the client has received all of the data and ACK'd it but then rudely closed the TCP connection