unsubscribe

unsubscribe

Re: HAproxy can't seem to bind to more than 1000 ports?

How do you install these patches into a working environment on ubuntu?   I am on version 1.4 but was curious how to do a patch install ? --- On Wed, 2/16/11, Willy Tarreau wrote: From: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: HAproxy can't seem to bind to more than 1000 ports? To: "John Carter" Cc: "Malcolm

Re: HAProxy false negatives with tomcat httpchk Layer7 timeout

Hi Neil, Le mercredi 16 février 2011 18:45:00, Neil Prockter a écrit : > Hello > > I using tomcat as a backend server and I'd like to use a httpchk. > Because tomcat splits the response to the keepalive over a few packets > haproxy is marking it as down. tshark shows the response is a 200 just >

Re: SSL read failed - closing connection during benchmarking haproxy SSL

I found the issue, it was with the nf_conntrack on the haproxy machine error.in the /var/log/kern.log [457925.806462] nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet so once i set the  sudo sysctl -w net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_max=131072 then the load test worked So i am guessing it was reachin

HAProxy false negatives with tomcat httpchk Layer7 timeout

Hello I using tomcat as a backend server and I'd like to use a httpchk. Because tomcat splits the response to the keepalive over a few packets haproxy is marking it as down. tshark shows the response is a 200 just its not in the first packet. However I'm confused. I've used 1.4.8/9 with differen

Re: SSL read failed - closing connection during benchmarking haproxy SSL

On 15 February 2011 16:49, Amol wrote: > > I was benchmarking my stunnel --> haproxy --> apache webserver configuration > from a ubuntu server and when i run this test i keep getting the SSL read > failed - closing connection error > here is the snippet > > $ ab -n 1 -c 10 https://xxx.xxx.co

Session Cookie Question

Hi Willy, I've a question about how we should configure HAProxy to support the session cookies in our environment. Apologies if you've answered this already, but I couldn't find it in the forums etc. if so! Our setup is that we have multiple backends to which a single frontend directs request,

optimize fast reaction in case of error

Hello, we provide one application ( apache+tomcat ) which should have very short response times. If a backend dies, the HAproxy should mark this backend "DOWN" as soon as possible. If all backends getting down, HAProxy should mark Frontend DOWN asap and reply with an errorcode asap. Wha

Re: HAproxy can't seem to bind to more than 1000 ports?

Hi John, On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:51:31AM +, John Carter wrote: > After a bit more experimenting - I have found that number of ports which > haproxy can listen on is set by the number of file handles per process. > > On linux systems this is set at 1024 by default, hence the limit 1024, > h

Re: HAproxy can't seem to bind to more than 1000 ports?

After a bit more experimenting - I have found that number of ports which haproxy can listen on is set by the number of file handles per process. On linux systems this is set at 1024 by default, hence the limit 1024, however this can be changed by editing : /etc/security/limits.conf where it is p