Re: State sync

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 23:45, Jaime Nebrera jnebr...@eneotecnologia.com wrote:  Hi all list members,  I'm wondering if its possible to share the connection affinity / state between a couple of HA proxies, in such a way, in case of failure the backup server will redirect the user to the

proper way to use an acl + stick-table to filter based on conn_cur

I have an haproxy.conf like so. I'm trying to limit based on the concurrent connections. backend thebackend stick-table type ip size 8k expire 5m store gpc0,conn_cur tcp-request content track-sc1 src acl mark_seen sc1_inc_gpc0 acl needs_increment

Re: State sync

Jamie, Cookies dont need state replication. Source IP has a new replication feature, example here: peers mypeers peer haproxy1 192.168.0.1:1024 peer haproxy2 192.168.0.2:1024 peer haproxy3 10.2.0.1:1024 backend mybackend mode tcp balance roundrobin

Re: TCP proxy capabilities

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:49:05PM -0700, g...@desgames.com wrote: That's something I considered, but the ultimate problem is that the backend service we're running (gearman) sometimes gets backed up with requests from our web servers. In this case, the server still looks 'up' (I *think*) but

Re: Question about using force-persist

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 02:18:36PM -0500, Shaw, Christopher wrote: We are attempting to implement a force-persist rule using HAProxy, but aren't having much success. Is the force-persist option available to be used with TCP connections? How are you trying to use it ? There are very little

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Moving pinging of master into a task

Thank you Simon ! I could not start the review yesterday, but tomorrow at the end of the day looks very likely. Cheers, Willy On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 06:14:15PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: This short series moves the pinging of a master process by its workers into a task to alleviate

Re: proper way to use an acl + stick-table to filter based on conn_cur

Hi Willy and Cory, Le mardi 15 mars 2011 22:17:50, Willy Tarreau a écrit : Whether I use src_conn_cur or sc1_conn_cur, with or without the table argument, this does not work. No matter how many concurrent connections per ip in the stick table, they never get denied. Any suggestions?

RE: Question about using force-persist

Willy, Thanks for the reply. We are attempting to use an ACL to (1) test for the existence of an RDP cookie using acl rulename req_rdp_cookie_cnt gt 0 and then (2) use the force-persist if rulename statement. Our end goal is to make sure that if a user has an existing session on a server

Re: Question about using force-persist

I have a similar interest. I'd love to see the full config that you have come up with. LES Sent from my iPad On Mar 15, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Shaw, Christopher christopher.s...@moodys.com wrote: Willy, Thanks for the reply. We are attempting to use an ACL to (1) test for the existence of

Re: proper way to use an acl + stick-table to filter based on conn_cur

Interesting... I was able to get it to work using a stick-table on the front-end, as bartavelle mentioned from this URL: http://tehlose.wordpress.com/2010/12/15/fun-stuff-with-latest-haproxy-version/ http://tehlose.wordpress.com/2010/12/15/fun-stuff-with-latest-haproxy-version/I don't know

Re: proper way to use an acl + stick-table to filter based on conn_cur

Hi Cyril, On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:34:51PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote: Hi Willy and Cory, Le mardi 15 mars 2011 22:17:50, Willy Tarreau a écrit : Whether I use src_conn_cur or sc1_conn_cur, with or without the table argument, this does not work. No matter how many concurrent connections