On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:55:25PM +0900, Ist Conne wrote:
So, It is difficult problem.
Do we have not Workaround?
I am not a lawyer either but I would recommend at some point that you
leave patent issues aside. If you really care about them, then you'll
quickly need to find another job :
OoO En ce doux début de matinée du mercredi 19 octobre 2011, vers 08:31,
wsq003 wsq...@sina.com disait :
For now I know some shortages of multi-processe mode haproxy:
1, it would cause many context switch (after testing, this is
acceptable)
2, it would become difficult to get status report
2011/10/18 Saul s...@extremecloudsolutions.com:
Hello List,
I am having an issue trying to translate some urls with my haproxy
setup and Im hoping someone can shed some light.
Information:
4 apache servers need a reliable LB such as HA. These apache servers
are listening on 80,443
2011/10/19 wsq003 wsq...@sina.com:
Hi
In manual there is following:
nbproc number
Creates number processes when going daemon. This requires the daemon
mode. By default, only one process is created, which is the recommended mode
of operation. For systems limited to small sets of file
Hi all,
I'm using haproxy as a frontend for a server on localhost, and I have one
backend where I want a remote server to be used in high load situations only.
My approach was to set minconn 0 on the backup server and minconn 10 on the
localhost, as well as setting the weights 256:1 for
5 matches
Mail list logo
