Hello,
I have a rather special problem to solve and would like to ask you if
haproxy could solve it.
We need to access a windows application through RDP which does *not*
support running under terminal services. So, on the local side, we have
set up several identical Windows XP Pro VMs with
Hi Andreas,
You could find your solution right here, using HAProxy:
http://blog.exceliance.fr/2011/10/24/microsoft-terminal-server-remoteapp-load-balancing/
If you're interested by the ALOHA appliance in such usage, you can
contact me of list.
cheers
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Andreas
I'm setting up a new website in the next month or two. Even though the traffic
won't require a scalable HA website, I'm going to start out as if the website
needs to support huge traffic so I can get some experience running such a
website.
I'd like any feedback on what I am thinking of doing…
I am running haproxy as a front end for Solr and Mule, currently on
1.5dev7. There are some occasional weird moments where haproxy marks
the primary solr server as offline and sends requests to the next
server. At this time I have no reason to think Solr is actually having
a problem, so I
Hi,
Why installing 2 layers of HAProxy???
A single one (on the 2 servers is enough). Since you're doing SSL, try
to make it start multiple processes, a single one dedicated to HTTP
and all other one for cyphering/deciphering processing...
I'm not a fan of first algo, unless you pay the resource
Hi,
dev17 fixes bugs from dev16 with no know regression or bugs for now...
Concerning your error, you consider one check failing to concider your
server as unoperational...
Try increasing this number to 2, to avoid false positive.
Is it possible you reach a connection limit on your apache
Thanks for the reply.
Why installing 2 layers of HAProxy???
A single one (on the 2 servers is enough).
My thought was that the second layer of HAProxy would ensure that the
individual backend server would never have more than MAXCONN requests so I know
the server will never be overloaded
Willy, for your reference, since applying the patch and restarting haproxy
on december 31 14:00 (on both my loadbalancers). There has not been a
single service down notification in my logs. Before the patch I had around
8 false 'server down' notifications per loadbalancer.
So it's a definate fix.
8 matches
Mail list logo