Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add http-check agent-hdr option

2013-04-17 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Simon, On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 02:36:36PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: Hi Willy, On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:29:12PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Simon, Sorry for the long delay and thanks for waiting. I've just reviewed your two patch series (16 total). They're pretty good in my

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add http-check agent-hdr option

2013-04-17 Thread Simon Horman
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:03:11AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Simon, On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 02:36:36PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: Hi Willy, On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:29:12PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Simon, Sorry for the long delay and thanks for waiting. I've just

Re: proxy name filtering introduced in haproxy 1.5

2013-04-17 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 17 avril 2013 01:00 CEST, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu : I've just recompiled haproxy 1.5 with the latest commits. The patch containing a box to filter proxies is useful but I think we should remove the autofocus keyword from the generated html. Currently, it prevents using the keyboard to

Re: HA Proxy FTP Load Balancing Timeout

2013-04-17 Thread Ben Timby
Alok, On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Alok Kumar a_sa...@yahoo.com wrote: I have a HA Proxy server(1.4), thzt is load balacing FTP traffic to Six FTP servers. I noticed that Load Balancer is dropping traffic after 50 sec, where as there was a valid ftp control port and Large file

how to limit access to only 50 users and redirect the others

2013-04-17 Thread Mikael Kermorgant
Hello, We are going to launch a web app for a critical subscription step in our school. A high load the day we open the server, and would therefore like to protect it from that and setup a waitqueue with ha proxy. But we wonder how to setup ha proxy for that. Our idea is that : * we have 3

Re: how to limit access to only 50 users and redirect the others

2013-04-17 Thread Baptiste
Hi Mikael, The question is: When do you consider your server overloaded? Is that when it is running more than 50 requests at a time? Or is that when it manages 50 sessions from an application point of view? In the first case, maxconn on the server line statement may help. In the second case, it

HAProxy on FreeBSD 8.3 with transparent proxying (TProxy?)

2013-04-17 Thread PiBa-NL
Hello HAProxy developers/users, I would like to be able to run HAProxy transparently on FreeBSD 8.3. This would be both for my own usage and also to make it available to a larger public by including it in a 'haproxy-devel' package for pfSense. However when trying to use it i get the error:

Re: HAProxy on FreeBSD 8.3 with transparent proxying (TProxy?)

2013-04-17 Thread PiBa-NL
I forgot to mention im using HAproxy 1.5dev18. Hello HAProxy developers/users, I would like to be able to run HAProxy transparently on FreeBSD 8.3. This would be both for my own usage and also to make it available to a larger public by including it in a 'haproxy-devel' package for pfSense.

Re: HAProxy on FreeBSD 8.3 with transparent proxying (TProxy?)

2013-04-17 Thread Baptiste
Hi, In order to work in transparent proxy mode, the server's default gateway must be the HAproxy server. Or at least, the traffic from the server must pass through the haproxy box before reaching the client. Even if HAProxy spoof the client IP, it's HAProxy which initializes the TCP connection,

Re: HAProxy on FreeBSD 8.3 with transparent proxying (TProxy?)

2013-04-17 Thread PiBa-NL
Hi Baptiste, Thanks for your reply, i understand that the traffic must pass through the router/HAProxy box, and for that part i can confirm that the routing of packets is 'working' like it should. To explain my setup a little more: *Webserver* (Win7) 192.168.0.40/24 on a OPT1/DMZ using

stick on src same source ip send request to different server port

2013-04-17 Thread William Wu
I'm wondering when setting up haproxy with stick on src, if the same client send 2 requests to different ports on server. i.e. 443 and 8443. Are these 2 requests going to hit same server always? Thanks, William

Re: stick on src same source ip send request to different server port

2013-04-17 Thread Baptiste
Yes, as long as you use them in the same backend or you point one backend to the other one. An example for a persistence for both IMAP and SMTP: http://blog.exceliance.fr/2011/07/14/send-users-to-the-same-server-for-imap-and-smtp/ Baptiste On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:58 AM, William Wu