On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:46 AM, joris dedieu wrote:
> Hi Syd,
> > I'm guessing an an NFS share from the 2 webservers to the 1 fileserver.
> However, from a bit of research with load balanced magento setups there
> seems to be a lot of negative comments about using NFS in this way.
>
> It's always
Hi,
You can startup multiple HAProxy processes...
Or you can also try this dirty trick: setup a stat backend per process
and browse the URL with the ";csv" parameter, like on the demo:
http://demo.1wt.eu/;csv
that way, you'll be able collect stats per process. You can even do it
over HTTPS :)
B
oh thank you so much !!! :D
---
posted at http://www.serverphorums.com
http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?10,343992,716626#msg-716626
hello all how i can move my spytic account to copy9 website. any help???
---
posted at http://www.serverphorums.com
http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?10,343992,716613#msg-716613
I found website www.copy9.com.
oh copy9 has many feature such as Ambient Voice Record, Yahoo Messenger Chat,
Whatpsapp, Key Logger, Voice Memos, Notes, Photo Camera Roll (Pictures)... with
lower price compared with spytic. Oh my god
---
posted at http://www.serverphorums.com
http://www.serverpho
unsubscribe
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hi Arne,
>
> just "git pull", the fix was committed 10 minutes ago ("dev18-53").
>
>
>
> Lukas
18-53 works :-)
Many thanks
Arne
Hi Arne,
just "git pull", the fix was committed 10 minutes ago ("dev18-53").
Lukas
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Arne, Emmanuel,
>
> I can successfully reproduce the issue with an old wget build on win32.
>
> It seems to me the SSL_TLSEXT_ERR_ALERT_WARNING is upsetting certain clients.
>
>
> Arne, could you try the following patch on top of currend HEAD
Arne, Emmanuel,
I can successfully reproduce the issue with an old wget build on win32.
It seems to me the SSL_TLSEXT_ERR_ALERT_WARNING is upsetting certain clients.
Arne, could you try the following patch on top of currend HEAD.
Emmanuel, could you share your thoughts about this?
Regards,
Lu
Hi,
My bad…
This fix should solve the issue
diff -ru haproxy-ss-20130530/src/ssl_sock.c
haproxy-ss-20130530-fix/src/ssl_sock.c
--- haproxy-ss-20130530/src/ssl_sock.c 2013-05-29 15:54:14.0 +0200
+++ haproxy-ss-20130530-fix/src/ssl_sock.c 2013-05-31 12:00:38.542448533
+0200
@@ -197
Hi everybody
First of all I want to say Thanks for work you have been doing and
great product you produce.
Today all servers are equipped with many cores and a lot of memory and
don't use them leads to inefficient utilization resources, especially
in case 10G, keepalive and SSL technologies.
We
> Apologies for not making this clearer, it is the SSLExplorer _Agent_ that
> fails.
By agent you mean the client which is on the "frontend" from a HAProxy
perspective?
> I can spin up an XP VM and test that IE 6 can connect to the
> SSLExplorer web interface over HAProxy 18-39 but as I'm not
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hi Arne,
>
>
>> I ran "sudo haproxy -d -f /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg>> haproxy-d.log
>> 2>&1" to capture the log output, I can't see anything obvious...
>
> In fact, I don't see anything wrong with these logs ...
>
>
> Looking at the bisected co
Hi Arne,
> I ran "sudo haproxy -d -f /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg>> haproxy-d.log
> 2>&1" to capture the log output, I can't see anything obvious...
In fact, I don't see anything wrong with these logs ...
Looking at the bisected commit, I highly suspect a SNI related regression.
I assume SSLexplo
Hi Fred,
> Seems with kqueue the CPU usage, reduces in 50%, which is great.
Yep, the polling system is very important to performance, and
select() is basically the worst of them.
> Do you know if they plan to add FTP Protocol support ?
I can't speak for Willy, but I did not see anything reg
16 matches
Mail list logo