Hi Patrick,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 04:34:15PM -0400, patrick.hem...@cloud.com wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, really busy here. Finally got a build with this
> patch in it, and after some light testing (development environment) it
> does appear to have solved the duplicate counter issue.
Cool, tha
On 08/13/2013 08:46 PM, hapr...@stormcloud9.net wrote:
> Oh, for some reason my mail client wasn't showing the response from
> Willy when I made this reply. Not sure if this info is really
> necessary any more. Will try the patch on that email and report back
> to it.
>
> -Patrick
>
> On 08/13/201
On 08/13/2013 11:53 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 03:45:36PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>> I'm using the %rt field in the "unique-id-format" config parameter (the
>> full value is "%{+X}o%pid-%rt"), and am getting lots of duplicates. In
>> one specific case,
I have worked on the Intel 82599 chipset and am not getting very good
results. I have looked for a good place for configuration assistance since
the driver has compile-time, load-time, and ethtool configuration options
that can dramatically change the performance of the haproxy process. One
of th
I've put up a quick blog entry here:
http://blog.loadbalancer.org/open-source-windows-service-for-reporting-server-load-back-to-haproxy-load-balancer-feedback-agent/
With links to a source code tar ball for haproxy including Simons patches.
I've also just open sourced (GPL'd) our Windows based se
Troy,
We've found the Intel cards and drivers consistently good with our
customers doing 10G load balancing:
http://www.loadbalancer.org/10g.php
On 15 August 2013 17:09, Troy Klein wrote:
> I working on a 10GB haproxy configuration and am wondering what card would
> be the network card that is
I working on a 10GB haproxy configuration and am wondering what card would
be the network card that is suggested to put into the hosts? I have seen a
post that say the ixgbe driver is difficult to configure and am wonder what
card/driver would not be difficult.
Troy Klein
Thanks Godbach. Maybe connection pooling feature in Haproxy future version
will fulfill my requirement.
I now try other method
Thanks and Best Regards
GuoXiang
Email&Gtalk:gx2008...@gmail.com
MSN: guoxiang2...@msn.com
"I COME, I SEE,I CONQUER"
On 2013/8/15 7:27, perlbox wrote:
Because the next request has something to do with the previous
request in the long connection, I want to replace the string and keep
alive the connection and let the client close the connection when it
want. Is there any option or method to do it?
Hi Guo
Hello Willy,
I believe the client (mstsc.exe) connects to the Gateway server via RPC
over HTTPS (443), the gateway then terminates this, and makes a new normal
RDP connection to haproxy, and then onwards to the Real servers, so in this
case the Gateway is the client to haproxy.
However what seams
10 matches
Mail list logo
