Hi, All:
In the past day, I want use pf’s “reply-to” on freebsd to solve ip address
overlapping problem. But it’s seems that pf’s “divert-to” and “divert-reply”
cannot work with haproxy on the same machine. Does haproxy in transparent mode
support FreeBSD’s divert mechanism ?
Regards
Hi, All:
In the past day, I want use pf’s “reply-to” on freebsd to solve ip address
overlapping problem. But it’s seems that pf’s “divert-to” and “divert-reply”
cannot work with haproxy on the same machine. Does haproxy in transparent mode
support FreeBSD’s divert mechanism ?
Regards
Hi!
While trying to reproduce Igor's problem, I noticed some strange behavior
in the stats output:
A server has an initial weight of 100, and unix socket, html and csv
outputs match. But when I modify the weight (in this case, I set it again
to 100), then the unix socket shows the correct
Hi!
Here is my config http://pastie.org/private/wf0dv30krqpasgmhtdnahw
(Deleted some servers and two backends for clear config)
I used script to handle servers weight since haproxy-ss-20131031, so I
never tried previous versions.
Sorry, still can't reproduce.
For problem 1 (after setting
Ваша жизнь будет симпатичнее. Ваша жизнь случится насыщеней и любопытней. Вы
по-видимому и не подозревали. http://goo.gl/g8Oa9J
I was happily using HAProxy, until I received word that we need to also
encrypt traffic to the web servers. So, internet --https-- load balancer
--https-- web servers. Can I still do this with HAProxy? We don't need
any Layer 7 rules. If so, what would the config look like?
We do need the
Hello,
I filled in the test result for the remaining cases. It is the same link
as before [1]. The tests were executed with 3 data sets as follows (a) 10K
requests (includes duplicate host headers) (b) All unique host headers in
1M requests (c) and 250K requests (includes duplicate hosts
7 matches
Mail list logo
