Hello Amol
Here is an example of the sort of thing I use
The 3 important things for are
ServerName https://servicename.domain.com:443
SetEnv HTTPS on
UseCanonicalName On
VirtualHost *:8080
ServerName https://servicename.domain.com:443
## Vhost docroot
DocumentRoot /var/www/
##
Title: Document sans nom
Cliquez ici pour lire cet e-mail dans votre navigateur. Bonjour $firstname$, Du 25/02 au 09/03 inclus, Profitez de votre offre Jeans : 1 jean achet -10 sur le 2ème article*
We are sorry that you decided to opt-out.
We confirm that this email account haproxy@formilux.org has un-subscribed.
Hi,
would it be possible to support IP_FREEBIND with HAProxy-1.5 on linux?
I'm asking because nonlocal_bind only works for IPv4 and it seems linux
upstream does not want to support nonlocal_bind for IPv6.
A thread about this can be found here:
On 03.03.2014 14:45, Sander Klein wrote:
Hi,
would it be possible to support IP_FREEBIND with HAProxy-1.5 on linux?
I'm asking because nonlocal_bind only works for IPv4 and it seems
linux upstream does not want to support nonlocal_bind for IPv6.
A thread about this can be found here:
Hi,
On 03.03.2014 14:45, Sander Klein wrote:
Hi,
would it be possible to support IP_FREEBIND with HAProxy-1.5 on linux?
I'm asking because nonlocal_bind only works for IPv4 and it seems
linux upstream does not want to support nonlocal_bind for IPv6.
A thread about this can be found
Lets set IP_FREEBIND on IPv6 sockets as well, this works since Linux 3.3
and doesn't require CAP_NET_ADMIN privileges (IPV6_TRANSPARENT does).
This allows unprivileged users to bind to non-local IPv6 addresses, which
can be useful when setting up the listening sockets or when connecting
to
Hi,
Im not sure if this is the exact issue that Anup was having, and maybe
i'm hijacking his thread, if so i'm sorry for that, but when try to
check how it works i also having difficulties getting it to work as i
expected it to.
I'm using HAProxy v1.5dev21 on FreeBSD 8.3.
Ive written in a
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:10:51PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Lets set IP_FREEBIND on IPv6 sockets as well, this works since Linux 3.3
and doesn't require CAP_NET_ADMIN privileges (IPV6_TRANSPARENT does).
This allows unprivileged users to bind to non-local IPv6 addresses, which
can be useful
Hi folks,
I was testing haproxy-1.5-dev22 on SmartOS (an illumos-based system)
and ran into a problem. There's a small window after non-blocking
connect() is called, but before the TCP connection is established,
where recv() may return ENOTCONN. On Linux, the behaviour here seems
to be always
Habilidades
Gerenciales de Alto ImpactoBogotá 11, 12, 13
de
Marzo de
2014
Toda
empresa, por extraordinaria que sea, es susceptible de caer. No hay
ninguna ley de la naturaleza que garantice que los más poderosos puedan
permanecer en la cima
Hi Joshua,
Hi folks,
I was testing haproxy-1.5-dev22 on SmartOS (an illumos-based system)
and ran into a problem. There's a small window after non-blocking
connect() is called, but before the TCP connection is established,
where recv() may return ENOTCONN. On Linux, the behaviour here
Hi guys,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:30:18AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi Joshua,
Hi folks,
I was testing haproxy-1.5-dev22 on SmartOS (an illumos-based system)
and ran into a problem. There's a small window after non-blocking
connect() is called, but before the TCP connection is
Hi Sander,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:01:12PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi,
On 03.03.2014 14:45, Sander Klein wrote:
Hi,
would it be possible to support IP_FREEBIND with HAProxy-1.5 on linux?
I'm asking because nonlocal_bind only works for IPv4 and it seems
linux upstream does
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:12:27PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
Hi,
Im not sure if this is the exact issue that Anup was having, and maybe
i'm hijacking his thread, if so i'm sorry for that, but when try to
check how it works i also having difficulties getting it to work as i
expected it
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 11:06:32PM +0530, vijeesh vijayan wrote:
Thanks. will share screenshot shortly. roundrobin recommented for mysql
also?
What Baptiste is explaining is that leastconn focuses on balancing
the number of established connections and not the cumulated number
of connections. If
16 matches
Mail list logo