Re: [PATCH] New Bit in Proxy Protocol V2

Resending. Any feedback on this? I'm not sure of the history of having both ssl_c_used and ssl_fc_has_crt. Should both bits be exposed in the proxy protocol? On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Dave McCowan 11235da...@gmail.com wrote: There are two sample commands to get information about the

Source based LB

Hi guys, I'm using haproxy 1.5dev21 with balance source. What I'm noticing is that the HAproxy is sending all the requests coming from different sources to the same Backend: backend bk_ws balance source option httpchk GET / server wsr1 10.174.82.15:8001 maxconn 3 weight 10 cookie

Source based LB

Hi guys, I'm trying to use HAProxy to load balance based on the source address. backend bk_ws balance source option httpchk GET / server wsc1 10.174.82.15:8001 maxconn 3 weight 10 check port 8001 inter 60s fall 1 server wsc2 10.174.82.16:8051 maxconn 3 weight 10 check port 8051

Re: Problems with http-response

No thoughts? Did I provide too much information? Not enough? - Jon From: Jon Fullmer fullme...@ldschurch.orgmailto:fullme...@ldschurch.org Date: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 at 3:54 PM To: haproxy@formilux.orgmailto:haproxy@formilux.org haproxy@formilux.orgmailto:haproxy@formilux.org Subject:

segfault in http_skip_chunk_crlf after 16G of data has passed through haproxy

Hello All, I'm seeing a segfault in 1.5.2 and 1.5.3 (haven't tried others) after a connection has transferred 16 GB of data. Any advice would be appreciated. (gdb) bt #0 http_skip_chunk_crlf (msg=0x214c250) at src/proto_http.c:2113 #1 http_request_forward_body (s=0x214c1a0, req=0x21b1500,

Re: Source based LB

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Luis Silva luisfilsi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I'm trying to use HAProxy to load balance based on the source address. backend bk_ws balance source option httpchk GET / server wsc1 10.174.82.15:8001 maxconn 3 weight 10 check port 8001 inter

Choisissez la mutuelle qui vous correspond

Cliquez ici pour lire cet e-mail dans votre navigateur.