Dear all,
Sorry, my lab systems were down for many days and I could not get back on
this earlier. After
new systems were allocated, I managed to get all the requested information
with a fresh ru
(Sorry, this is a long mail too!). There are now 4 physical servers,
running Debian 3.2.0-4-amd64,
Dearfriend,
Hello,
Doyoustlllo=okingforpowerbankthatprefectfitintopurse,andsuitabletomake=fullcolorprintinglogo?
Wehaveacreditcardshapep=owerbank,thisitemisbestchoicetocustomyourbrand,plsfindnbs=p;attachedproductpicture.Thispowerbankcanbeusedforallkindsofmobile=phones.
Hey lady or man,Golftrading here, exportingGolfwith good quality and low price in china.
We canprovide technical support andafter saleservice ,Able to provide free samples
Call me, let's talk details.
Rgds,
Rick
tel:00852-97966836
On 29/04/15 04:26, Baptiste wrote:
Hi,
You need to enable the check-ssl on the server line.
In your case haproxy sends a check in clear, while the server expects a
ciphered connexion.
That's correct, because I am trying to keep the health checks on the
cleartext TCP/25 port.
However, I did
On 29/04/2015 12:56 μμ, Krishna Kumar (Engineering) wrote:
Dear all,
Sorry, my lab systems were down for many days and I could not get back
on this earlier. After
new systems were allocated, I managed to get all the requested
information with a fresh ru
(Sorry, this is a long mail too!).
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:18 AM, iain expat.i...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29/04/15 04:26, Baptiste wrote:
Hi,
You need to enable the check-ssl on the server line.
In your case haproxy sends a check in clear, while the server expects a
ciphered connexion.
That's correct, because I am trying to
I have an existing load balancer installation that I have been slowly
migrating from IPVS to haproxy. It's CentOS 6, so many components are
out of date, such as TLS support.
Once that migration is done, I would like to entirely replace the
hardware and load an ideal software environment for
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 09:24:42AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:25:02PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 06:43:38AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:58:56AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
This seems only to
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:26:56PM +0530, Krishna Kumar (Engineering) wrote:
Request directly to 1 nginx backend server, size=256 bytes:
Command: ab -k -n 10 -c
Hello all,
with HAProxy 1.5.11, we have implemented rate limiting based on some
aspects of the request (Host header, path, ...). In our implementation,
we delay limited requests by forcing a WAIT_END in order to prevent
brute-force attacks against e.g. passwords or login tokens:
acl
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:10:32PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
Hi,
the aim of this series is to make the send more email alerts when
they are likely to be useful and less when they are likely to be
unwanted.
(...)
Whole series applied, thank you very much!
Willy
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 06:56:23PM -0400, CJ Ess wrote:
When you run HAProxy in full debugging mode there is a debug_hdrs() call
that displays all of the http headers read from the frontend, I'd also like
to be able to see the headers being sent to the backend.
So far I haven't pinpointed
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 07:31:28AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:10:32PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
Hi,
the aim of this series is to make the send more email alerts when
they are likely to be useful and less when they are likely to be
unwanted.
On 4/29/2015 3:00 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
How can I be sure that openssl is compiled with support for TLS
acceleration in the CPU? I am compiling haproxy from source. Would you
recommend that I install a separate and newer openssl from source for
explicit use with haproxy, and tweak its
Hi,
the aim of this series is to make the send more email alerts when
they are likely to be useful and less when they are likely to be
unwanted.
Changes in v2:
* As suggested by Willy Tarreau, lower the priority at which email alerts
for of log-health-checks messages are sent rather never
Document the influence of email-alert level and other configuration
parameters on when email-alerts are sent.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
---
doc/configuration.txt | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc/configuration.txt
index
This is similar to the way email alerts are sent when servers are marked as
DOWN.
Like the log messages corresponding to these state changes the messages
have log level notice. Thus they are suppressed by the default email-alert
level of 'alert'. To allow these messages the email-alert level
Lower the priority of email alerts for log-health-checks messages from
LOG_NOTICE to LOG_INFO.
This is to allow set-ups with log-health-checks enabled to disable email
for health check state changes while leaving other email alerts enabled.
In order for email alerts to be sent for health check
19 matches
Mail list logo
