Bridgelux COB flood light from Lina

Dear Sir, Glad to hear that you are on the market of led light, we as a manufacturer of led flood light for 12years in Shenzhen China. Below you can find some product information of COB flood light for your reference:

Re: Question on distribution not according to backend weight

On 8 мая 2015 г., at 4:54, Frank Schubert f.schub...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, first of all let me thank you for an amazing piece of software. I like working with haproxy a lot! My problem: The weight setting for a backend seems to be ignored when the max concurrent session setting is

Is FTP through haproxy at all viable?

I have a load balancer setup with both haproxy and LVS-NAT. The LVS-NAT is giving us high availability for FTP. When I tried migrating everything from CentOS 5, where it all works, to Ubuntu 14 (for the newer kernel and because I find debian-based systems far easier to use), everything worked

Re: Is FTP through haproxy at all viable?

With some iptables rules you can use FTP active and passive mode via haproxy. The key is to assign unique passive port ranges to each backend then port forward those ranges. You must be able to configure each FTP server daemon with it's own range. You must also be able to configure your FTP

Re: Question on distribution not according to backend weight

Hi Frank, My problem: The weight setting for a backend seems to be ignored when the max concurrent session setting is reached. I was expecting the connection to get queued for this backend but it seems to flip over to the host that has connections available. This is expected. The queue

Re: Is FTP through haproxy at all viable?

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Shawn Heisey hapr...@elyograg.org wrote: I have a load balancer setup with both haproxy and LVS-NAT. The LVS-NAT is giving us high availability for FTP. When I tried migrating everything from CentOS 5, where it all works, to Ubuntu 14 (for the newer kernel and

Re: Question on rewriting query string

Wow, very nice, regular expressions sure are powerful :-) Here is what I ended up with: defaults mode http timeout connect 1s timeout client 1s timeout server 1s listen HTTP-in bind 127.0.0.1:80 reqrep .*(sid=[a-z0-9A-Z]*)(sid_guid=[^]*).*(strid=[0-9a-zA-Z]*) \1\2\3shopurl=search.aspx

Re: Question on distribution not according to backend weight

Hi Babtiste, thanks a lot for your explanations! This totally makes sense, especially from a HA and throughput perspective. My use case is different and I'll try to explain how: * 30 servers are generating emails * 36 mail servers for sending out * relatively cheap h/w: 2 bonded 1Gbit interfaces,

Re: Is FTP through haproxy at all viable?

On 5/8/2015 8:39 AM, Ben Timby wrote: With some iptables rules you can use FTP active and passive mode via haproxy. The key is to assign unique passive port ranges to each backend then port forward those ranges. You must be able to configure each FTP server daemon with it's own range.