Aw, man !
My C skills are so rusted :)
I’ll look at your comments and correct all this.
BTW, a bit off-topic : have you looked at a code-review server like
gerrit ?
Quite useful for multi-round patchset submission like this one.
--
Mildis
Le 2015-10-10 15:49, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 05:02:08PM +0200, Mildis wrote:
> Aw, man !
> My C skills are so rusted :)
>
> I???ll look at your comments and correct all this.
Thanks.
> BTW, a bit off-topic : have you looked at a code-review server like
> gerrit ?
No but quite frankly I don't believe a single
Bump -
I don't mind maintaining my own HAProxy package, but it seems bad to
release a major version with the interactive stats socket broken. Any
thoughts on the patch?
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Jesse Hathaway
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Andrew
On 10/10/2015 12:31 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Is the response closed when this happens (eg: server crash) ? If so,
> we could add some sample fetches to detect that the request or response
> channels are closed in case that could help. This is trivial to do, but
> it will only be reliable if the
Hi Vincent,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> From: Vincent Bernat
>
> "unknown" was spelled "unkown".
Applied, thanks!
Willy
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 12:07:43AM -0700, peter cai wrote:
> I found there is use_after_free bug in the pat_ref_delete_by_id.
>
> diff --git a/haproxy/src/pattern.c b/haproxy/src/pattern.c
> index 4bd6924..0bd35a7 100644
> --- a/haproxy/src/pattern.c
> +++ b/haproxy/src/pattern.c
> @@
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:36:57PM +0300, Jarno Huuskonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 09, Sébastien LECOMTE wrote:
> [...]
> > acl allowed_clients hdr_sub(X-Real-IP) 10.10.200.0/24
> > 213.200.107.128/25 213.254.248.96/27 62.72.112.128/28 84.199.92.128/26
> > 91.237.72.4
>
> [...]
>
> >
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 05:05:12AM -0400, Julien Vehent wrote:
> On 2015-10-08 18:24, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> >Are you sure your TLSv1.2 client is actually sending
> >jve.linuxwall.info as SNI value? I suggest to remove the
> >SNI if statement while testing the TLS ACL.
>
> Argh... I can't count
Hello Cédric,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:56:41PM +, Cédric Petter wrote:
> Bonjour
>
> First of all, if I need to explain in English, please tell me.
Yes the list is in english, but I understood your problem so I'll
put out a quick summary and will respond :-)
> Je suis bloqué avec HAProxy
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:30:30PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>
>
> On 06/10/2015 12:25 , Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi ladies and gentlemen!
> >
> > Things are calming down when I'm away from the keyboard, I'll start to
> > think I'm really the only one who introduces bugs!
> >
> > Some
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:27:07AM -0700, Joseph Lynch wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> I am pretty sure that HAProxy cannot retry requests themselves because
> it does not know what side effects the request had. It can retry
> connections but once the session is assigned it returns results or
> fails.
>
Here is a working patch for IPv6 literal with square brackets.
Tested with :
"2001:db8::1234:5678",
"2001:db8::1234:5678:",
"2001:db8::1234:5678:80",
"2001:db8::1234:5678:80:",
"::",
":::",
":::80",
"[2001:db8::1234:5678]",
"[2001:db8::1234:5678]:",
"[2001:db8::1234:5678]:80",
"[::]",
"[::]:",
>> jve.linuxwall.info as SNI value? I suggest to remove the
>> SNI if statement while testing the TLS ACL.
>
> Argh... I can't count the number of times forgetting -servername in
> openssl s_client got me looking for a bug. This one included.
>
> "acl tls12 req.payload(9,2) -m bin 0303" works as
On 2015-10-10 02:02, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 05:05:12AM -0400, Julien Vehent wrote:
On 2015-10-08 18:24, Lukas Tribus wrote:
>Are you sure your TLSv1.2 client is actually sending
>jve.linuxwall.info as SNI value? I suggest to remove the
>SNI if statement while testing the
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 01:50:46PM +0200, Mildis wrote:
> Here is a working patch for IPv6 literal with square brackets.
> Tested with :
> "2001:db8::1234:5678",
> "2001:db8::1234:5678:",
> "2001:db8::1234:5678:80",
> "2001:db8::1234:5678:80:",
> "::",
> ":::",
> ":::80",
>
15 matches
Mail list logo