Re: [PATCH] BUG/MINOR: acl: don't use record layer in req_ssl_ver

On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 08:54:39AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > >> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ smp_fetch_req_ssl_ver(const struct arg *args, struct > >> sample *smp, const char *kw > >> if (bleft < 5) > >> goto too_short; > >> > >> - version = (data[1] << 16) + data[2]; /* version: major, minor */ > >> +

Re: trailling whitespace after HTTP version

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: > Hi, > When we migrated from Apache HTTPD to HA Proxy we found a strange problem. > We have some old HTTP client (embedded devices) which send a trailling > whitespace after the HTTP version. > The send: "GET

Re: use several gpc's ?

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Sylvain Faivre wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to use several gpc's ? > > I already use gpc0 to track client IPs generating too many errors, and I > need to use another counter to track client IPs requesting some pages too > fast. > >

[PATCH v2] BUG/MINOR: acl: don't use record layer in req_ssl_ver

The initial record layer version in a SSL handshake may be set to TLSv1.0 or similar for compatibility reasons, this is allowed as per RFC5246 Appendix E.1 [1]. Some implementations are Openssl [2] and NSS [3]. A related issue has been fixed some time ago in commit 57d229747 ("BUG/MINOR: acl:

Fast reloads leave orphaned processes on systemd based systems

When reloading haproxy too fast on EL7 (RedHat, CentOS) the system is being filled with orphaned processes. I encountered this problem on CentOS 7 with haproxy-1.5.4-4.el7_1.x86_64 but expect it to exist on all systems using haproxy-systemd-wrapper not just those based on Fedora. Steps to

[SPAM] Reliable, Flexible, and Responsible PCB Partner

Dear Sir or Madam，    Good Morning. This is sales manager's assistant Rosia from WHX Electronic Co.,Ltd. Hopefully not disturbing. Pls allow me to introduce our company and products to you, and hope that we may enter into business cooperation in the future.   WHX

Re: LUA, 'retry' failed requests

Hi Thierry, Op 5-11-2015 om 8:08 schreef Thierry FOURNIER: Hi, Now, because of you I have my own freebsd installed :). I can reproduced the segfault. I suppose that the OS other than Freebsd are impacted, but luckyly it not visible. OK thanks for installing and trying on FreeBSD :) i suppose

RE: [PATCH v2] BUG/MINOR: acl: don't use record layer in req_ssl_ver

>> This should be backported to stable series, the req_ssl_ver keyword was >> first introduced in 1.3.16. > > Thanks Lukas, applied to 1.7, 1.6, 1.5 and 1.4. For 1.3 there might be > other patches pending so this one will get there at the same time. Great. I didn't really expect a 1.3 backport,

Re: LUA, 'retry' failed requests

Hi Pieter, On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 08:21:26PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: > >I encounter an easy compilation error. So can you test the two attached > >patches. The first one fix the compilation issue, and the second one > >fix he segfault. > First patch removes the warning below though it always build

Re: [PATCH v2] BUG/MINOR: acl: don't use record layer in req_ssl_ver

On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 08:31:28PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > >> This should be backported to stable series, the req_ssl_ver keyword was > >> first introduced in 1.3.16. > > > > Thanks Lukas, applied to 1.7, 1.6, 1.5 and 1.4. For 1.3 there might be > > other patches pending so this one will get

Discount Louis Vuitton Store

Your email client cannot read this email. To view it online, please go here: http://91kuyule.com/display.php?M=129224=5cc5ccbc3b027c395176c49b322e54d3=6!L=5!N=10 To stop receiving these emails:http://91kuyule.com/unsubscribe.php?M=129224!C=5cc5ccbc3b027c395176c49b322e54d3!L=5!N=6!lan=en

Re: use several gpc's ?

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Sylvain Faivre wrote: > On 11/05/2015 03:30 PM, Baptiste wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Sylvain Faivre >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a way to use several gpc's ? >>> >>> I already use

Re: trailling whitespace after HTTP version

Hi Baptise, Thanks for the feedback. Enabling this only on accept-invalid-http-request is fine for me. I agree this is not the correct behaviour, but most of reverse proxy and http proxy we used for several years were resilient to that (even fixing that) so that's why I'm asking. Julien On Thu,

Re: use several gpc's ?

On 11/05/2015 03:30 PM, Baptiste wrote: On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Sylvain Faivre wrote: Hi, Is there a way to use several gpc's ? I already use gpc0 to track client IPs generating too many errors, and I need to use another counter to track client IPs

❤ Les plus belles rencontres pour une nuit ou pour la vie

Title: Toujours plus de rencontres Site de rencontre généraliste où les femmes ont le pouvoir Découvrez le