Hi Willy,
I have reviewed the DOC lua.txt twice. Attached is a patch for this
documentation to fix some typos and syntax errors.
The patch should be also backported to 1.6.
Any further amendment for this patch will be much appreciated.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From
On 2016-02-12 22:46, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:54:53PM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
I want to load balance and make sessions sticky based on the contents
of
a request header. In a nutshell, all requests with the same header
value
must go to, and stick to, the same backend
Hello,
First-timer on the mailing list :-) Below is my question.
I created a custom HAProxy load balancing code, that instead of using one
of the default algorithms such as round robin, calls a webservice that
decides which server to route to. I call from haproxy C code to the
webservice using
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:53:58PM +0100, P.Baauw wrote:
(...)
> Seems ok for me.
> Should i send a separate patch for 1.6 then?
That would be awesome yes, that would save me some time.
> And should it keep parsing the 'wrong' keyword for the retry value
> (+loud warning) ?
Yes, that's it,
Hi Willy,
Op 15-2-2016 om 19:46 schreef Willy Tarreau:
Hi Pieter,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:40:42PM +0100, P.Baauw wrote:
Hi Willy,
I decided to make it MEDIUM because it might break an existing config
that is using a 'wrong' config option and would currently be parsed and
working
Hi Pieter,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:40:42PM +0100, P.Baauw wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> I decided to make it MEDIUM because it might break an existing config
> that is using a 'wrong' config option and would currently be parsed and
> working 'properly' when configured like this:
>
> timeout
Hi Willy,
I decided to make it MEDIUM because it might break an existing config
that is using a 'wrong' config option and would currently be parsed and
working 'properly' when configured like this:
timeout retri 1s
or
timeout WRONG 1s
Would both work 'properly' and be used for
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 06:03:13PM +0100, Baptiste wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> Thanks Pieter.
>
> Patch validated on my side.
> I updated the patch with backport information.
Thanks. So should I adjust the subject to mention this is a bug ? In this case
I'd say it's still minor. I hardly understand
Hi Willy,
Thanks Pieter.
Patch validated on my side.
I updated the patch with backport information.
Baptiste
From 83f908683a137b3e947e7d12b7e90f1b4a22db58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pieter Baauw
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:51:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] MEDIUM: dns:
Hi,
Would you be interested in Sophos Endpoint Security Users List?
We also have other Related Technologies Like: Symantec Endpoint Protection,
McAfee Endpoint Protection, Norton, Trend Micro Endpoint Security,
Malwarebytes, Kaspersky Endpoint Security, Avast Endpoint Protection, Druva
Greetings,
On 02/14/2016 08:39 PM, Woody Woodpecker wrote:
Hello,
I am struggling to get an acl working to reject traffic originating
from servers protected by the Cloudflare network, while my servers are
behind Cloudflare too …
So I allow only traffic from the Cloudflare network to
Hi,
This is my first post on this list, so please let me know if my request is
appropriate to this list and, most of all, if the question has not been
already posted looong ago and is to be found in list archives or someplace
else on the web.
I've been using Haproxy for 2 years now, both
I can put username is there but not the password.
Is it there.
Regards,
Pankaj Bhardwaj
Final Year UnderGraduate(CSE)
IIT Rajasthan,jodhpur
13 matches
Mail list logo