Hi Felipe,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:01:41PM -0300, Felipe Guerreiro Barbosa Ruiz wrote:
> This fixes a regression introduced in d7bdcb874bcb, that removed the
> ability to use req.payload(0,0) to read the whole buffer content. The
> offending commit is present starting in version 1.6, so the pat
Hi Michal,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:13:01PM +0100, Michal wrote:
> Hello!
> Any news in this topic? Is there anything wrong with my patch?
Not yet, we're just totally drowning under complex bugs resulting in
minor features to be delayed :-/
Thanks,
Willy
Hi Cyril,
A few comments below. First, I'd prefer not to add anything in
run_poll_loop() since we have to pass there a lot of times and it's on
the critical path. Instead I think we could create a task upon receipt
of SIGUSR1 that will either kill all connections or simply exit after
expiration (a
Hi Manu,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:35:42PM +0100, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> > Le 16 mars 2017 à 09:48, Piotr Kubaj a écrit :
> >
> > Thanks for the patch!
> >
> > Looks good to me, works fine with Haproxy and LibreSSL 2.5.1.
> >
> great
>
> Willy, can you merge this two patchs?
> On 19 Mar 2017, at 14:40, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 01:12:09PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> OK here's a temporary patch. It includes a revert of the previous one and
>> adds a condition for the wake-up. At least it passes all my tests, including
>> those invol
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 01:12:09PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> OK here's a temporary patch. It includes a revert of the previous one and
> adds a condition for the wake-up. At least it passes all my tests, including
> those involving synchronous connection reports.
>
> I'm not merging it ye
6 matches
Mail list logo
