Ah, I didn't realize that id was the puid! Let me try that out!
So just curious, if the puid is what we're using to uniquely identify
servers, why can't we update the name dynamically? It seems like
use-server and the like should use these puids rather than the names?
-Joey
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017
I had faced the same issue and have documented my solution at
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg26387.html
Regards,
Vivek
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Aaron West wrote:
> On 8 July 2017 at 11:25, Aaron West wrote:
>> for me
Hi Joseph,
A quick and stupid question: can't Synapse enforce the server's PUID? (you
can do that using the server 'id' parameter)
I mean, when genrating the backend configuration, you can enforce it.
IE:
backend b_myapp
[...]
server s1 1.0.0.1:80 id 1
server s2 1.0.0.2:80 id 2
Hi,
Aleksandar Lazic wrote on 05.07.2017:
> Hi,
> I have here a use case where the haproxy is in between a
> couchdb/oracle/dynamic connect backend.
For couchbase the suggested solution was to use hostnames in couchbase.
https://forums.couchbase.com/t/couchbase-behind-haproxy-tcp-proxy/13416
Hi Emmanuel,
This seems to work fine.
I've tested with 1 CA certs, without the option on I get "tcp window full"
followed by tls fatal alerts, with the option on the connection works fine.
I haven't tested the crt-list option.
Do you know if it is possible to add this to stable (1.5/1.6)?
5 matches
Mail list logo