Re: varnishtest with H2>HTX>H1(keep-alive)

Hi Pieter, On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:07:44AM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: > Hi List, > > I'm trying (and failing?) to write a H2>HTX>H1(keepalive) test. > > Using haproxy 1.9-dev6-05b9b64. > > Test vtc attached, i added the 'option http-use-htx' to the fe4 > frontend/backend. > Is there anything else

varnishtest with H2>HTX>H1(keep-alive)

Hi List, I'm trying (and failing?) to write a H2>HTX>H1(keepalive) test. Using haproxy 1.9-dev6-05b9b64. Test vtc attached, i added the 'option http-use-htx' to the fe4 frontend/backend. Is there anything else that should be changed? Or is my way of making the H2 request incorrect? Though the

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9-dev7

Hi, HAProxy 1.9-dev7 was released on 2018/11/18. It added 148 new commits after version 1.9-dev6. This version will come as a great relief for some of us. It finally contains a big chunk of the HTX modifications we've tried to integrate for about 2 months now. This also means that the stream-inte

Re: HAProxy bytes in/bytes out stats are not updated

Hi Sergey, On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 05:23:23PM +0300, Sergey Arlashin wrote: > Hi! > > We have a TCP service that is load-balanced with HAProxy. It works pretty > well, however the stats page doesn't seem to report correct traffic > statistics. Even though we have data transferred all the time, s

HAProxy bytes in/bytes out stats are not updated

Hi! We have a TCP service that is load-balanced with HAProxy. It works pretty well, however the stats page doesn't seem to report correct traffic statistics. Even though we have data transferred all the time, stats show the same amount of bytes in/out. Our traffic if mainly long running TCP