H2 perf tuning

Hi, I'm trying to figure out whether the following tuneables apply only to bound HTTP sockets ou tune.h2.header-table-size tune.h2.initial-window-size tune.h2.max-concurrent-streams

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MINOR: config: Warn cookie domain only if missing embedded dot

Hi Willy, > Em 30 de out de 2019, à(s) 01:41, Willy Tarreau escreveu: > > Hi Joao, > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:10:11PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote: >> >> What I need to implement is a way to share the sticky session cookie between >> two distinct but related domains, say haproxy.org and

Re: ELB scaling => sudden backend tragedy

I had come to think that haproxy was not parsing a Truncate-flagged DNS response that had usable entries in it. After further investigation, tcpdump made clear that the truncated DNS response enumerated *no* 'A' records, expecting the client to switch to TCP for the query. So we'll be looking at

Re: Research on Chord Progressions

Just wanted to see what you thought of the below. Hope you are well! P.O. Box 135, Whitianga 3510, New Zealand | To unsubscribe please reply with 'Unsubscribe' in the header On Thursday, October 24, 2019 at 10:45 AM, Jen Miller wrote: > Dear Editor, > > My name is Jen and I’m an Editor at

interoperation between SCVMM and HAProxy dataplane api

hi, is anybody running things like https://www.poppelgaard.com/microsoft-scvmm-2012citrix-netscaler-o ? I mean using SCVMM in so called "services management", i.e. dataplane api ? thanks, Ilya Shipitsin

Re: http-request do-resolve Woes

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:48 PM David Birdsong wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:39 AM Baptiste wrote: > >> Thanks! >>> >>> It had that feel to it...seemed like a cache lock timeout and/or somehow >>> tied to the request interval. >>> >>> >> I think I know where to fix this behavior in the

[PATCH V4] MINOR: sample: add us/ms support to date/http_date

It can be sometimes interesting to have a timestamp with a resolution of less than a second. It is currently painful to obtain this, because concatenation of date and date_us lead to a shorter timestamp during first 100ms of a second, which is not parseable and needs ugly ACLs in configuration to

Re: http-request do-resolve Woes

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:39 AM Baptiste wrote: > Thanks! >> >> It had that feel to it...seemed like a cache lock timeout and/or somehow >> tied to the request interval. >> >> > I think I know where to fix this behavior in the code. I will work on the > "how to fix it" later tonight. > In the

Re: http-request do-resolve Woes

> > Thanks! > > It had that feel to it...seemed like a cache lock timeout and/or somehow > tied to the request interval. > > I think I know where to fix this behavior in the code. I will work on the "how to fix it" later tonight. In the meantime, you can apply the workaround below. This is doable

Re: http-request do-resolve Woes

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019, 9:58 AM Baptiste wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 8:18 PM David Birdsong > wrote: > >> I should have put the haproxy version in the mail too: >> >> haproxy 2.0.8 >> >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 3:07 PM David Birdsong >> wrote: >> >>> I've narrowed down a behavior that I

Re: http-request do-resolve Woes

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 8:18 PM David Birdsong wrote: > I should have put the haproxy version in the mail too: > > haproxy 2.0.8 > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 3:07 PM David Birdsong > wrote: > >> I've narrowed down a behavior that I think might be a bug, but is >> definitely not ideal. >> >> This

Re: http-request do-resolve Woes

Hi, On Tue, Oct 29, David Birdsong wrote: > I've narrowed down a behavior that I think might be a bug, but is > definitely not ideal. > > This minimal configuration copies header: X-Host into Host and performs a > dynamic DNS query against that field name, stores the output in a txn var, > and

google summer of code 2020 ?

hello, are there any plans to participate GSoC 2020 ? thanks, Ilya Shipitsin