On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 01:27:22PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> when looking at the newest PRNG commits I noticed that some places that
> now use ha_random() still refer to RAND_MAX. You should check whether
> that still is appropriate, because my understanding is that you are now
>
It seems to me that shifting the variable 'a' at the end of the
functions is of no use. Maybe there is something I don't see here, in
which case I apologize. :)
--
Zaga
What can change the nature of a man?
>From 772c6517400e45c6e07c7f0fd733d9cbd68c65da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
Willy,
when looking at the newest PRNG commits I noticed that some places that
now use ha_random() still refer to RAND_MAX. You should check whether
that still is appropriate, because my understanding is that you are now
guaranteed to receive a specific number of bits.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
3 matches
Mail list logo