Hi.
I try to use automatically the backend server when the primary serve is not
available.
The following snipplet is my solution with haproxy (2.1.3-3ppa1~bionic).
Is there a bette solution or is this a okay solution from HAProxy point of view?
```
backend be_static
log global
option
Hi Nicolas.
On 08.04.20 20:34, Nicolas Pujol wrote:
Hi,
I installed haproxy and two test servers with the basic configuration of nginx
+ listening on port 443. The HAProxy server provides the Let's encrypt SSL
certificates.
When I consult the 2 sites in HTTP, I have no problem.
With HTTPS
Hi,
I installed haproxy and two test servers with the basic configuration of
nginx + listening on port 443. The HAProxy server provides the Let's
encrypt SSL certificates.
When I consult the 2 sites in HTTP, I have no problem.
With HTTPS it works *sometimes*. Mostly from smartphone but not from
Hello,
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 13:59, kkazmierc...@wp.pl wrote:
>
> Hello,
> We need to know which ports on the server need to be reopened in order to
> appropriate work of HAProxy.
Haproxy does not listen to any ports by default. It listens only to
those ports that you configured haproxy to
Hello, We need to know which ports on the server need to be reopened in order
to appropriate work of HAProxy. Based on www.haproxy.com www.haproxy.com I
see bind proprty and stats socket property which determine on which ports the
server is listening to. Are there any other ports on which
Hi Christopher And Willy,
Please review the RT test results.
Thanks,
Kiran Gavali
-Original Message-
From: Kiran Gavali
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 6:59 PM
To: Christopher Faulet ; Willy Tarreau
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org; Shivharsh Singh ;
Priya Ranjan ; Ramanpreet Singh Bakshi
;
NFP WORKSHOPS
18 Blake Street, York YO1 8QG
Affordable Training Courses for Charities, Schools & Public Sector
Organisations
This email has been sent to haproxy@formilux.org
CLICK TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM LIST
Alternatively send a blank e-mail to unsubscr...@nfpmail1902.co.uk quoting
On 08.04.20 09:46, Ionel GARDAIS wrote:
Oh my !
This is a chroot issue.
haproxy is running in chroot but the fpm socket is outside.
When placing the socket inside the jail, it works with the socket.
Does the performance difference between IP and socket is worth the trouble ?
I'm sure there
Oh my !
This is a chroot issue.
haproxy is running in chroot but the fpm socket is outside.
When placing the socket inside the jail, it works with the socket.
Does the performance difference between IP and socket is worth the trouble ?
--
Ionel GARDAIS
Tech'Advantage CIO - IT Team manager
On 08.04.20 08:52, Ionel GARDAIS wrote:
It works with 127.0.0.1:29001 (the listener I configured for this pool)
That's an important successful test.
I personally prefer the tcp way to afoid such problems.
About the socket :
- it lives in /run/php with
$ ls -alF /run/php/speedtest-fpm.sock
It works with 127.0.0.1:29001 (the listener I configured for this pool)
About the socket :
- it lives in /run/php with
$ ls -alF /run/php/speedtest-fpm.sock
srw-rw 1 www-data www-data 0 Apr 7 21:11 /run/php/speedtest.sock=
- /run/php is owned by www-data:www-data with 755 perms
$ ls -alF
11 matches
Mail list logo
