❦ 14 janvier 2021 19:24 +01, Tim Düsterhus:
> I just checked haproxy.debian.net and noticed that the information
> regarding the backports is not up to date:
>
> For Debian Buster the backport should be moved from 2.0 to 2.2.
>
> I'd also like to note that you have a typo in haproxy.js. It says
>
Vincent,
Am 14.01.21 um 08:21 schrieb Vincent Bernat:
> It's not really a conflict, but yes, you have an unecessary "downgrade"
> to the same version as currently backports has 2.2.x. You can switch to
> Debian backports but in the future, it may get 2.4.x while
> haproxy.debian.net ensures you st
Hi Adis,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Adis Nezirovic wrote:
> From 6823e172b71590d4c540bddaa36add217828644c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Adis Nezirovic
> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:02:33 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] BUG/MEDIUM: stats: Add missing INF_BUILD_INFO definition
>
> It was
Hi guys,
Recent prometheus exporter patch broke stats (specifically Lua
core.get_info() maybe other stuff)
The offending commit is:
commit 5a982a71656ce885be4b1d4b90b8db31204788a1
Author: William Dauchy
Date: Fri Jan 8 13:18:06 2021 +0100
MINOR: contrib/prometheus-exporter: export bu
Hi Good Morning,
Hope all is well there. I am Rasmiranjan, wanted to discuss a few things
about a newly developed marketing strategy that will help your business to
reach on Google's first page, and can drive more qualified traffic from
organic search engine results.
We do all businesses with l
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:21 AM William Lallemand
wrote:
> VTest is not really suited to test the process management, for example
> the tests doing a reload have timing issues because VTest is not able to
> know when HAProxy is ready.
>
> Could you share what you tried to do? I'm not sure what is
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:35:27AM +0100, William Dauchy wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 1:22 PM William Lallemand
> wrote:
> > Thanks to both of you! merged in master.
>
> a side note: yesterday evening I wanted to have a look at a reg-test
> in order to prevent it in the future, but it looks l
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 1:22 PM William Lallemand
wrote:
> Thanks to both of you! merged in master.
a side note: yesterday evening I wanted to have a look at a reg-test
in order to prevent it in the future, but it looks like `-expectexit`
from haproxy varnishtest is not really designed for that.
8 matches
Mail list logo
