Re: Upgrading from 1.8 to 2.4, getting warning I can't figure out

On 6/8/2021 1:47 AM, Remi Tricot-Le Breton wrote: OCSP stapling won't work on any version that shows this warning (for this specific response). But apart from that, everything else should work fine, that's why you only get a warning when parsing the configuration file. If you are positive that

Re: Speeding up opentracing build in CI ?

William, On 6/10/21 5:48 PM, William Lallemand wrote: Looks fine to me, but from what I remember when debugging some reg-tests there was only one CPU available, I hope I'm wrong. GitHub-provided Action runners are 2-core VMs:

Re: Speeding up opentracing build in CI ?

I was mistaken. LibreSSL does not like parallel install libressl fails on `make -j4 install` · Issue #461 · libressl-portable/portable (github.com) anyway, if CI works, I'm ok with changes чт, 10 июн. 2021 г. в 20:49, William Lallemand

Re: Speeding up opentracing build in CI ?

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 07:52:23AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Subject: Re: Speeding up opentracing build in CI ? > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 07:19:37AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:15:46AM +0500, ??? wrote: > > > OT takes about 30 sec (it is built with

Re: Speeding up opentracing build in CI ?

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:00:32AM +0300, ??? wrote: > openssl does not support -j for make install > I filed a bug on them, they told me "OK, just don't use it" I don't care about install, which I didn't touch, but about "all". I never install anything with -j anyway. The savings are

info about update haproxy-1.8.30

Hi support, I have installed haproxy-1.8.30 from sources on redhat 7.9. I would like to know what procedure I can follow to update that when will be releases next minor version Thanks a lot Emiliano [AVIO SpA] Emiliano Mastroianni IT Network & Security T + 39 06 972 85

Re: Speeding up opentracing build in CI ?

openssl does not support -j for make install I filed a bug on them, they told me "OK, just don't use it" On Thu, Jun 10, 2021, 8:52 AM Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 07:19:37AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:15:46AM +0500, ??? wrote: > > >