[PATCH] BUG/MINOR: server: fix persistence cookie for dynamic servers

2024-03-21 Thread Damien Claisse
When adding a server dynamically, we observe that when a backend has a dynamic persistence cookie, the new server has no cookie as we receive the following HTTP header: set-cookie: test-cookie=; Expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:01 GMT; path=/ Whereas we were expecting to receive something like the

Re: [PR] FEATURE: load private keys from PKCS#11 pkcs11-provider PEM files

2024-03-21 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 10:58:17AM +0100, William Lallemand wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 05:34:12PM +0800, Richard Chan wrote: > > Yes I would be happy to include HAProxy with pkcs11-provider examples. > > > > Great, thank you! > > I made a `PKCS11 provider` >

Re: [PR] FEATURE: load private keys from PKCS#11 pkcs11-provider PEM files

2024-03-21 Thread William Lallemand
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 05:34:12PM +0800, Richard Chan wrote: > Yes I would be happy to include HAProxy with pkcs11-provider examples. > Great, thank you! I made a `PKCS11 provider` https://github.com/haproxy/wiki/wiki/OpenSSL-Providers-in-HAProxy#pkcs11-provider that you could edit once we

Re: [PR] FEATURE: load private keys from PKCS#11 pkcs11-provider PEM files

2024-03-21 Thread Richard Chan
Yes I would be happy to include HAProxy with pkcs11-provider examples. On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, 16:43 William Lallemand, wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 10:39:58AM +0800, Richard Chan wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PR] FEATURE: load private keys from PKCS#11 > pkcs11-provider PEM files > > On Thu, 21

Re: [PR] FEATURE: load private keys from PKCS#11 pkcs11-provider PEM files

2024-03-21 Thread William Lallemand
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 10:39:58AM +0800, Richard Chan wrote: > Subject: Re: [PR] FEATURE: load private keys from PKCS#11 pkcs11-provider PEM > files > On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, 00:15 William Lallemand, wrote > > > > > We made test in the past with the TPM2 provider which also uses a URI in > > the