Re: [PATCH] [RFC]/MINOR: connection: Add server name to proxy protocol v2 header.

Hi Amos, Thanks for the answers. After a bit of a delay, I’m getting back to implementing this. However, I still have a couple of questions in line below... Thanks, Erik > On 2016 Jun 1, at 08:44, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > > On 30/05/2016 11:03 p.m., E

Re: [PATCH] [RFC]/MINOR: connection: Add server name to proxy protocol v2 header.

> On 27/05/2016 2:42 a.m., Willy Tarreau wrote: >>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:20:36AM -0400, Erik Seres wrote: >>>> Hi Willy, >>>> >>>> Attached is my updated patch per your styling update request. >>> >>> Thanks Erik. I'm now CCing Dav

Re: [PATCH] [RFC]/MINOR: connection: Add server name to proxy protocol v2 header.

Hi Willy, Attached is my updated patch per your styling update request. Thanks, Erik On 2016 May 26 Thu at 08:40:00, Willy Tarreau (w...@1wt.eu) wrote: Hi Erik, sorry for the long delay. On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Erik Seres wrote: > If the client provides the server n

[PATCH] [RFC]/MINOR: connection: Add server name to proxy protocol v2 header.

flag PP2_CLIENT_SNI to accomplish this in an additional TLV. Please review. Thank you, Erik Seres 0001-RFC-MINOR-connection-Add-server-name-to-proxy-protoc.patch Description: Binary data

Doc vs. source code inconsistency

Hello, I noticed that commit "f1650a8” has updated doc/proxy-protocol.txt which now lists PP2_SUBTYPE_SSL_xxx defines. However, the actual source code still uses PP2_TYPE_SSL_xxx defines. I think this inconsistency should be corrected. Erik Seres

Server Name Indication in Proxy Protocol line

this functionality? If there isn’t, I am going to attempt and submit a patch. Also, what does the registration of a new PP2_TYPE_xxx entail? Thank you, Erik Seres