,
Matt C
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:04:26PM -0700, Matt Christiansen wrote:
I added in the tun.bufsize 65536 and right away things got better, I
doubled that to 131072 and all of the outliers went way. Set at that
with my tests
Hello,
I am wanting to move to HAProxy for my load balancing solution. Over
all I have been greatly impressed with it. It has way more throughput
and can handle way more connections then our current LB Solution
(nginx). I have been noticing one issue in all of our tests though, it
seems like in
some improvements in latency
(http://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg05080.html), i
think you can give it a try, take the daily snapshot for this.
Regards,
Hervé.
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 23:57:38 -0700
Matt Christiansen ad...@nikore.net wrote:
Hello,
I am wanting to move
, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:37:00AM -0700, Matt Christiansen wrote:
I turned on those two options and seemed to help a little.
We don't have a 2.6.30+ kernel so I don't believe option
splice-response will work(?). Thats one of the things I'm going to try
next.
Splicing is OK since 2.6.27.something
-0700, Matt Christiansen wrote:
Hi Willy,
I agree the haproxy logs show that, but we also monitor the time spent
processing the request which takes in to account, GC, reading data off
the FS and a number of things inside the app and I see no 3sec times
in there or anything near it. Also I have
5 matches
Mail list logo
