Hi Cerrie:
I was wondering if you were successful with your changes.
—Ray
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Cerrie Russell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Hoping to get some help please.
>
> I have an issue with httpchk whereby the layer7 check can only see the 301
> which is redirecting to SSL page. So it
Hi Cerrie:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Cerrie Russell wrote:
> So we are seeing the 301/2 to HTTPS/SSL.
>
Since the server to which you are connecting simply forwards you to the
HTTPS, why not connect the backend directly to the HTTPS service and avoid
the redirect?
—Ray
--
Raymond Cote
Hi Willy:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I think at this point we'd rather add an "sni" argument to the tcp-check
> connect, then you could resort to this one instead. That would allow you
> to write whatever complex sequence as you'd like.
>
Agree that this sounds like
Hi Willy:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Can the Health Check be driven by the SNI parameter in the server line?
>
> No because the SNI parameter takes an expression. People will typically
> use "ssl_fc_sni" here, meaning that the SNI of the front connection has
> to b
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 01:49:02PM -0400, Ray Cote wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:10 PM, wrote:
> >
> > > http://discourse.haproxy.org/t/can-1-6-do-sni-on-backend/278/12
> > >
>
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:10 PM, wrote:
> http://discourse.haproxy.org/t/can-1-6-do-sni-on-backend/278/12
>
I’ve been looking for an official place to post a request ticket for this
(I’m the originator of that thread).
Yes, it does seem that HAProxy 1.6 does not send the SNI header during the
he
6 matches
Mail list logo
