Re: Help tracking "connection refused" under pressure on v2.9

2024-03-29 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
; > Another one that could make sense to monitor is "PoolFailed" in > "show info". It should always remain zero. We collect this (all available actually); I don't remember this one ever measuring more than zero. But we'll keep an eye on it. In time, could this be somewhat unrelated to HAProxy? I.e., maybe kernel? Cheers, -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez https://www.taghos.com.br/

Re: Help tracking "connection refused" under pressure on v2.9

2024-03-28 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
ecking if the default values are still > in line with your usage. We set our defaults pretty high in anticipation: /proc/sys/fs/file-max = 5M; /proc/sys/fs/nr_open = 3M; Even with our software stack, we do not reach the limits. A long time ago we did hit (lower limits ba

Re: Help tracking "connection refused" under pressure on v2.9

2024-03-27 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
s/2508) with more details. Cheers, -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez https://www.taghos.com.br/

Re: Help tracking "connection refused" under pressure on v2.9

2024-03-27 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
re trying to get a core dump, too. Cheers, -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez https://www.taghos.com.br/

Re: 1.8.19: Segfault at startup with nbthread > 1 and option tcp-check

2019-04-01 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
5575d1f0) at > src/checks.c:1549 This segfault might be fixed with this commit: http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commit;h=4bccea98912c74fa42c665ec25e417c2cca4eee7 Cheers, -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez http://www.taghos.com.br/

[PATCH] BUG/MAJOR: segfault during tcpcheck_main

2019-03-28 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
the same behavior found in another function in src/checks.c, which also calls protocol_by_family but that function tests for a NULL pointer before dereferencing it. Best regards, -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez http://www.taghos.com.br/ >From 29684452b9cf923e321537ffc1f4694c88131f4b

Re: 1.9.2: Crash with 300% CPU and stuck agent-checks

2019-03-15 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
d8b5b in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #5 0x0040257a in ?? () [Inferior 1 (process 4929) detached] Note the use of "-batch", so there won't be GDB prompts such as confirmation for detaching from the process. Cheers, -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez http://www.taghos.com.br/

Re: possible use of unitialized value in v2.0-dev0-274-g1a0fe3be

2019-02-08 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
t; Thus I believe this is a false-positive. Thank you for checking this out and, by extension, Willy on his set of replise. I missed the marker (and apparently, so did Clang). Cheers, -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez http://www.taghos.com.br/

possible use of unitialized value in v2.0-dev0-274-g1a0fe3be

2019-02-06 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
to be correctly unearthed by scan-build. Also, there might be a chance that this path invokes undefined behavior, leading to further surprises. Does this make sense? Cheers, -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez http://www.taghos.com.br/

possible use-after-free on v1.9-dev0-3-ge78915a4

2017-11-27 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
ced by the filter 'cache'.\n", 925 curproxy->id, (char *)fconf->conf); 926 err++; 927 } I'm not sure how realistic this might be (especially to exploit), but it feels worthy of reporting. C