Duplicate X-Forwarded-For

Hi All, The backend application depends on the X-Forwarded-For value and today we noticed an interesting problem. I have enabled 'option forwardfor' and it works fine when no X-Forwarded-For header is added by the client. When there is X-Forwarded-For added by the client(I used chrome rest

Re: Duplicate X-Forwarded-For

:) -Habeeb On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Holger Just hapr...@meine-er.de wrote: Hey, On 2012-02-01 17:41, habeeb rahman wrote: When there is X-Forwarded-For added by the client(I used chrome rest client) I can see haproxy is sending two X-Forwarded-For to the backend instead

haproxy status and graphing

Hello All, It would be great if someone could clarify following. This is regarding the haproxy-status page. current conns means the number TCP connections in the ESTABLISHED state or its all TCP connections from client and to backend? Errors resp means http non 200 from backend? Also what is

Best way to find the version

Hi All, Just wondering what is the best way to find the haproxy version. This is rightscale AMI so I was not the one who installed it. Eithor yum list installed|grep haproxy or rpm -qa|grep haproxy helped. Anyhelp would be great. Also keep the awesome work guys! -Habeeb

Re: Help on SSL termination and balance source

insight? Anyone else has any thoughts or insights to share? -Habeeb On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:11 PM, James Bardin jbar...@bu.edu wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:33 AM, habeeb rahman pk.h...@gmail.com wrote: apache rewrite rule: RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ http://127.0.0.1:2443%{REQUEST_URI} [P